Would Sacha Baron Cohen Have Been a Better Freddy Mercury?
The question of whether Sacha Baron Cohen could have portrayed Freddie Mercury as well as Rami Malek is a topic of much debate. Many believe that Rami Malek's portrayal in Bohemian Rhapsody was exceptional, but it is still intriguing to speculate about other actors who might have done just as well or even better. Let us delve into the merits of both actors and explore why Rami Malek's performance received such acclaim.
Why Rami Malek's Performance Was Praiseworthy
It is almost impossible to imagine anyone else playing Freddie Mercury as Rami Malek did. It took painstaking effort, dedication, and countless hours of preparation. Rami Malek had the foresight to hire a movement coach, piano coach, and singing coach. He absorbed numerous videos of Freddie Mercury, read biographical books, and engaged in conversations with friends and acquaintances. This meticulous preparation spanned several years and significantly contributed to his stellar performance in the film.
The Role and Script's Impact on Performance
Even with all his preparation, Rami Malek's portrayal did not fully convey the essence of Freddie Mercury for some viewers. One possible reason is the script itself. Some might argue that the story detracted from the authenticity of the character. The script might have inhibited Rami Malek's ability to fully embody Freddie Mercury, thereby affecting the overall portrayal.
Despite the challenges posed by the script, it is still reasonable to wonder if Sacha Baron Cohen would have been able to perform just as well or better. However, there are valid reasons to doubt his suitability for the role. First and foremost, Sacha Baron Cohen is primarily recognized for his comedic and over-the-top performances. This could make it difficult to take his portrayal of Freddie Mercury seriously.
Rami Malek vs. Sacha Baron Cohen: Assessment
The physical appearance and height of both actors are also factors to consider. Rami Malek's performance was more in line with the 70s era, and there is a consensus that he nailed the performance part. His portrayal was able to convey the vulnerability and emotion, qualities that were essential to Freddie Mercury's character. On the other hand, Sacha Baron Cohen's earlier works are associated with comedy and satire, making it unlikely for him to effectively capture the gravity required for the role.
It is also worth mentioning that Rami Malek did not just look like Freddie Mercury; he managed to convey the emotional depth that was central to the character. If the role were different, possibly when Rami Malek took on the project, the outcome might have been different. However, the script and the existing perception of Sacha Baron Cohen's talents and style are significant hurdles.
Other Potential Choices
While the question of Sacha Baron Cohen versus Rami Malek is a fascinating one, it is worth considering other actors who might have been suitable. For instance, Hale Appleman, known for his versatility, could have taken on the role more adeptly. His ability to convey character depth and nuance makes him a more serious contender for the role of Freddie Mercury.
The Role of Parody and Truth
Lastly, the role of parody in a biopic is a critical aspect. Some argue that the script of the original announcement of the role might have imposed a sense of parody, which would not have been an accurate representation of Freddie Mercury's life and character. Rami Malek's portrayal, while praised, was not considered a perfect reflection of Freddie Mercury.
In conclusion, while the debate on who would have been a better actor for the role is ongoing, Rami Malek's performance in the film Bohemian Rhapsody is widely recognized as exceptional. However, other actors, including Sacha Baron Cohen and Hale Appleman, could have potentially brought unique qualities to the character. The success of an actor in such a demanding role as Freddie Mercury ultimately depends on interpretation, physical resemblance, and the script itself.