Would Kishore Kumar or Mohammed Rafi Get Paid More Today?
When it comes to choosing between Kishore Kumar and Mohammed Rafi, it is quite clear that Kishore Kumar would likely receive greater recognition and compensation if they were alive and active today. This assessment is based on multiple factors including their vocal styles, performance abilities, and the broader context of their multifaceted talents.
Vocal Styles and Preferences
Voice: While Mohammed Rafi is renowned for his classical singing and serene, sweet, and fresh voice, Kishore Kumar's voice has a more masculine quality that resonates with contemporary audiences. People today might find his voice more appealing, making him a more attractive artist in the modern era.
Artistic Performance and Spirit
Performer: Kishore Kumar was a master artist who not only sang but also embodied each song. His ability to capture the essence or spirit of a song was unparalleled. His performances were more than just singing; they were portrayals that touched the hearts of listeners. Even though Manna Dey, a renowned singer, held his own in terms of knowledge of classical singing, Kishore Kumar's performance was more emotive and expressive.
Yoddling and Audience Connection
Yoddling: Kishore Kumar's yoddling, a unique vocal style, was a significant part of his charm. It added an additional layer of appeal that surely has a place in today's music. Rafi, while a remarkable singer, did not have a similar stand-out vocal technique that Kishore Kumar possessed.
Sense of Humor and Star Quality
Sense of Humour: Kishore Kumar was known for his great sense of humor and could bring immense laughter onto the set. His ability to entertain and lighten up the mood is qualities that are still highly valued in today’s entertainment industry. His humor would be a perfect addition to the personalities of modern films and television shows.
Acting and Versatility
Acting: Kishore Kumar was not just a singer but also an accomplished actor. His roles in films, though he later retired from acting, contributed to his star quotient. This multi-talented attribute gives him an edge over a singer who focuses solely on vocal performances.
Legacy and Influence
Mohammed Rafi was indeed a universe's gift to the world. His vocal prowess inspired numerous contemporary artists, including Sonu Nigam. However, when it comes to the broad spectrum of his influence and the depth of his talent, it is Kishore Kumar who stands out. His ability to captivate audiences through various genres of music, coupled with his versatility as a singer, actor, music director, producer, and screenwriter, makes him more marketable in today's multifaceted entertainment landscape.
While both performers made their mark in the world of Indian classical music, Kishore Kumar's multifaceted contributions and the enduring appeal of his voice and persona suggest that he would likely command higher salaried in today's industry where multi-talented individuals with a broad range of skills are highly sought after.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Kishore Kumar's combination of vocal prowess, multifaceted talents, and the ability to connect with audiences across multiple dimensions would make him the more marketable and highly compensated artist in today's entertainment industry. His comprehensive skill set and broader influence make him the safer choice for the modern market, as both creators and audiences today tend to prize those who can bring multiple talents to the table.