Why Steven Crowder Avoids Debating with Sam Seder
Steven Crowder often avoids debates with individuals whose audiences are significantly smaller or not as well-prepared. This article explores the reasons behind his reluctance to engage in a conversation with Sam Seder, a pundit with a notably smaller audience compared to Crowder's vast following.
Steven Crowder’s Policy on Debates
Steven Crowder has established a policy of only engaging in public debates with individuals whose audiences are of comparable size. This ensures that he does not have to spend time and energy debating anyone who may not be well-prepared or whose platform is not on par with his. This policy allows him to focus on debates that attract substantial interest and conversations that are meaningful.
Comparing Subscribers and Views
The difference in audience size between Steven Crowder and Sam Seder is significant. While the Majority Report, hosted by Sam Seder, has 1.16 million subscribers and 511,718,194 views, Steven Crowder's followers number 5.52 million, with a total of 1,403,893,769 views. This disparity in the number of followers and the volume of views indicates that Crowder’s audience is substantially larger and more engaged than Seder's.
Crowder’s Avoidance Justified by Audience Size
Crowder's decision to avoid debating Sam Seder can be justified by the rationale that it does not align with his established policy. Engaging in a debate with someone whose audience is much smaller would not yield the same level of interest or impact as debates with individuals having a comparable following. The logical conclusion is that Crowder chose to avoid engaging with Seder to maintain the quality and significance of his content.
Constructive Advice for Seder
In response to questions about why Crowder does not engage, Sam Seder might be advised to focus on building a more substantial and engaged audience. This can be achieved through consistent quality content, engaging in more meaningful debates, and networking with other notable figures within the same field. Building a larger and more respected following would make him a more attractive debate partner for Crowder.
Contrary Views on Seder’s Preparation
It is also important to note that there are differing views on Sam Seder's readiness for debate. Some argue that Seder might have been tricked into a situation where he was not fully prepared. Emotional stress or the aftermath of major surgery can affect one's ability to engage in such intense activities. This perspective supports the notion that Seder's hesitation to debate could be due to genuine concerns about his readiness.
Final Insights
While Steven Crowder’s avoidance of debates with individuals whose audiences do not match his own can be seen as rational, it is also essential to consider the personal circumstances of each debater. Emotional and physical factors can play a significant role in one’s willingness to participate in high-stakes conversations. Ultimately, the decision to debate or not is a complex one and should be based on a combination of preparedness, mutual respect, and the potential for meaningful engagement.