Why Robert Baratheon Did Not Destroy House Velaryon After Roberts Rebellion
After the conclusion of the Robert's Rebellion, House Velaryon was not destroyed by Robert Baratheon for several compelling reasons. This article explores the political, strategic, and personal motivations behind Robert's decision, providing insights into the complex interplay of loyalty, power, and history in the Westeros.
Political Alliances and Stability
House Velaryon, known for its significant naval strength and wealth, played a crucial role in the realm. Their control of Driftmark and their ties to the Targaryens made them a powerful house. Destroying them could have led to instability and alienated other houses who might have felt Robert's actions were excessive. By sparing House Velaryon, Robert maintained a balance of power and prevented potential rebellion.
Loyalty and Service
While House Velaryon had been historically loyal to the Targaryens, their support had waned over the years leading up to the rebellion. Robert may have valued their continued loyalty and the potential for service to his new regime. This strategic decision allowed for the consolidation of power and the legitimacy of the Baratheon rule.
Strategic Importance of Sail and Trade
The Velaryons possessed a strong navy, which was essential for maintaining control over seas and trade routes. By keeping House Velaryon intact, Robert could leverage their naval power to strengthen his position against potential threats. This strategic alliance was crucial for ensuring stability and unity across the realm.
Legacy of Clemency and Solidifying Rule
Rather than outright destruction, Robert might have shown a degree of clemency to demonstrate strength and generosity. Allowing House Velaryon to remain intact could have won over other houses and solidified his rule. This approach aligned with the traditional Westerosi belief that mercy could be a powerful tool in governance.
Personal Relationships and Family Ties
There were personal ties between the Velaryons and the Targaryens, including familial marriages. By honoring these connections, Robert maintained familial relationships that could have provided leverage and goodwill. Severing these relationships completely might have had unforeseen consequences, potentially leading to resentment and rebellion.
House Velaryon and the Blackfyre Rebellions
Recent theories and evidence suggest that House Velaryon might have been supporters of the Blackfyres. The Blackfyre Rebellions were a series of conflicts aimed at placing the illegitimate House Blackfyre on the Iron Throne. The Velaryons' historical ties to Daenaera Velaryon and subsequent events, such as the marriage of Alyn and Baela to Daeron III, hint at potential support. House Velaryon's isolation from the Targaryens in the latter half of the dynasty also raises questions about their loyalty.
Robert Baratheon was not as fanatical about Targaryen extermination as commonly believed. He primarily wanted Rhaegar Targaryen dead, and his actions were driven by personal grievances rather than a broader extermination policy. The death of Rhaegar satisfied Robert's immediate desire for revenge, and the continued existence of Viserys and Daenerys represented a personal torment rather than a political necessity.
Conclusion
Robert Baratheon's decision not to destroy House Velaryon was a calculated move aimed at ensuring stability and consolidating his power. Political alliances, strategic importance, and personal relationships all played roles in his decision. The complex interplay of loyalty, power, and history underscores the nuanced nature of Robert's rule in the aftermath of the Robert's Rebellion.