Why Relatable Vile Characters Enhance Storytelling
As an author navigating the complex landscape of fictional narratives, one critical decision lies in the portrayal of the antagonist. While the idea of writing a sympathetic villain might seem fresh and refreshing, in reality, it is often a crutch for avoiding the true art of crafting a compelling protagonist. The act of creation, especially in the context of villains, demands a level of depth and relatability that resonates with readers and deepens the narrative.
A Tool for Writers vs. a Challenge for Readers
The notion of a sympathetic villain is intriguing but potentially cumbersome. In real life, most individuals struggle with sympathy for even the simplest acts, such as their family members or behind-the-counter workers at fast food restaurants. It is not coincidental that the idea of a sympathetic villain feels skewed. This phenomenon might be viewed as a storytelling convention that provides an easy path for authors to sidestep the real challenge: creating a nuanced, sympathetic hero.
The villain in a story is the ultimate actor; they are the catalyst for movement and action. Writers and readers alike tend to gravitate towards the 'actor' in the narrative, even if that actor is a despicable or unappealing character. Conversely, characters who are merely victims or those who face adversities without proactive measures do not translate as vividly. A truly sympathetic hero is one who drives the story forward with their actions, creating obstacles and solving puzzles within the framework of the story.
The Importance of Relatability in Villains
Creating a villain who is multifaceted and relatable ultimately makes the narrative more engaging and morally rich. Stories with antagonists who are 3D and developed, mirroring the complexity of the protagonist, are not only more believable but also more captivating. Readers appreciate when the writer puts effort into crafting real, multidimensional characters. This approach not only enhances the overall quality of the work but also makes the story a more fertile ground for imaginative exploration.
Letters to Mary Sue (or Gary) and highly unrealistic characters are common pitfalls. Balancing the creation of an antagonist who is both undesirable and believable is a skill that can elevate a story. Characters who are just as three-dimensional as their protagonists add depth and interest to the narrative, showcasing the writer's ability to create a believable and complex world. This reflection of humanity, through flawed and sympathetic antagonists, invites readers into a more immersive and emotionally resonant experience.
Symbolic vs. Relatable Villains
The decision of whether your villain should be a symbol or a fully-fleshed character is ultimately up to the author. If the antagonist represents a broader concept or obstacle that many encounter in life, such as a systemic issue or fate that seems to work against them on purpose, then they become a symbol of a larger message. In such cases, the relatability of the villain is less important than the thematic depth of the story.
Alternatively, if the narrative explores the complexities of human relationships and the reasons people oppose each other due to their unique histories, then the villain should be a complex and relatable character. Their actions and motivations should resonate with the reader, making the story more engaging and easy to connect with.
The relatability of villains, therefore, lies at the heart of creating a rich and compelling narrative. Whether serving as a symbol or a fully developed character, the depth and complexity that arise from creating relatable villains offer a richer, more engaging experience for both creators and readers alike.