Why Psychics Refuse My Readings: An Investigative Study

Recently, I've encountered a series of rejections from various astrologers and psychics who refuse to offer readings to me. These rejections have ranged from a friend's father to experienced astrologers, even tarot card readers I've interacted with at parties. Interestingly, my past experiences with accurate readings in 2002 and 1996 have left me perplexed. This article explores the reasons behind these rejections and the broader context of prejudice against individuals on the autism spectrum.

Personal Experiences of Rejection and Inconsistent Treatment

Over the years, I've experienced a variety of rejections from psychic services. Notably, the rejections have come from:

A friend’s father An astrologer I have previously worked with Tarot card readers at parties

In addition to these rejections, some psychics have even gone so far as to directly state that I have "bad energy," a term often used to describe individuals who are considered emotional or chaotic. In the context of the autism spectrum (ASD), this might stem from the fact that my communication style can be quirky and may not always align with the norms expected by neurotypical individuals. These biases and prejudices are unfortunately common, not only within workplaces but also in the dating scene and other areas of social interaction.

The Need for a Better Understanding of Autistic Individuals

One of the key insights from these experiences is the need for a better understanding and acceptance of individuals on the autism spectrum. As someone with ASD, my communication and behavioral patterns may be perceived as "quirky" or off-putting. However, it's important to recognize that these traits are simply expressions of how I perceive and interact with the world differently. While some psychics might feel that I am so damaged that a reading could drain them, it's essential to address these biases and prejudices. Past accurate readings have shown that I have valuable insights and experiences that can be beneficial both personally and professionally.

Scientific Approach to Understanding Psychic Readings

To further explore these rejections, I have proposed a scientific method to determine whether the rejections are due to underlying biases rather than actual psychic abilities. Here is a step-by-step plan to test the validity of psychic readings:

Create burner accounts with Gmail, ensuring they look legitimate. This involves copying someone else’s name from Facebook to create unique accounts, ensuring none look similar. Message some psychics with the burner accounts, using a tool like Google Coin Flip to randomly determine which accounts to use for each interaction. Use a grammar software like Grammarly to generate basic sentence structures, avoiding giveaways about the source of the messages. Log which psychics said yes and which said no, and repeat the test with different accounts for each psychic across three iterations. Contact psychics using the chosen pseudonyms to confirm if they will book an appointment. Document and publish the results.

A hypothesis derived from this method is that none of the psychics who initially rejected you would manage to have more than a coincidental success rate. This is supported by the expectation that their judgments are based on biases and preconceptions rather than genuine psychic abilities.

The Question of Psychic Realism

The question remains: Do psychics truly exist? To address this, I have formulated a rationale based on a lack of empirical evidence supporting their claims:

Empirical Evidence: There is currently no scientific proof supporting the existence of psychics or their ability to provide accurate readings. Human Factor: Many so-called psychic readings can be explained by human factors such as intuition, deduction, and empathy rather than supernatural abilities. Social Bias: The widespread belief in psychics is often fueled by social and psychological factors, rather than actual evidence.

By exploring these factors, we can challenge the narratives surrounding psychics and reevaluate the value of these services in a more skeptical light.

In conclusion, the rejections experienced in seeking psychic readings highlight the need for greater awareness and acceptance of individuals on the autism spectrum. A scientific approach may help demystify the claims of psychics and challenge their perceived abilities. Ultimately, the validity of psychic readings remains a topic of debate, but it is important to approach them with a critical and evidence-based mindset.