Why No Astrologer Predicted Jayalalithaa’s Death
It is often surmised that astrologers possess the ability to foresee significant life events, including deaths. This belief, however, is founded on the deeply ingrained cultural practices and traditions of many nations, particularly India, where astrology has a rich history and enduring popularity. Yet, the question remains: why did no astrologer predict the death of Jayalalithaa, a prominent political figure in Tamil Nadu?
Astrology: A Pseudoscience
Astrology, as a practice, is widely regarded as a pseudoscience with no scientific basis. Despite being a source of entertainment and a means of seeking guidance for many, it is not supported by any concrete evidence. Countries with a high percentage of intelligent and rational citizens, such as the United States, have largely dismissed astrology as nothing more than a parlor trick. This is a testament to the critical thinking and scientific literacy exhibited by the American populace.
The Case of Venkateswaran, the Daredevil Astrologer
Despite the widespread skepticism, some astrologers continue to practice and predict significant events. In the case of Jayalalithaa, an astrologer by the name of Venkateswaran, also known as Venkateshwamy, predicted her death a month before it occurred. Venkateswaran is a political and cinema astrologer, often daring in his predictions, particularly in the Telugu-speaking region.
He is well-known for accurately forecasting the political landscape of Tamil Nadu, including the insurgence of the AIADMK party after Jayalalithaa's demise. Additionally, he made a prediction about an economic crisis in 2020, which he revealed in a YouTube interview in December 2019. Interestingly, he even predicted the onset of the pandemic, albeit inaccurately, which demonstrates his compulsion to make public predictions.
Despite his numerous predictions, Venkateswaran admits to a 90% accuracy rate in various matters. He carries out pujas for celebrities and politicians who possess certain astrological configurations (Raj Yogas) in their horoscopes. For those without these configurations, he refrains from performing such ritualistic practices.
Star Astrologer Vishnu Das's Unambiguous Prediction
Contrary to some astrologers, Vishnu Das, also known as the Star Astrologer on Twitter, made an unambiguous and accurate prediction about Jayalalithaa's death eight months in advance. He posted this prediction in 2016, citing her imminent demise despite her active political engagement and public wellness. When Jayalalithaa passed away in December 2016, his prediction was proven correct, thus solidifying his reputation as a reliable astrologer in the eyes of his followers.
Critical Thinking and Skepticism
The failure of many astrologers to predict Jayalalithaa's death is a stark reminder of the need for critical thinking and skepticism in our society. Despite the prevalence of astrological beliefs, it is essential to evaluate claims based on empirical evidence and logical reasoning. The case of Venkateswaran and Vishnu Das highlights the varied and sometimes conflicting nature of astrological predictions, underscoring the importance of remaining open-minded and rational in our inquiry.
In summary, astrological predictions, while popular in certain cultures, are fundamentally unreliable and unscientific. The historical context of Jayalalithaa's death and the various astrological predictions made serve as a lessons in the need for critical evaluation and the importance of empirical evidence in understanding significant life events.