Why Manushi Chillar Should Not Be Miss World 2017: A Closer Look at Her Values and Background

Why Manushi Chillar Should Not Be Miss World 2017: A Closer Look at Her Values and Background

Manushi Chillar's campaign for Miss World 2017 is causing a significant stir, particularly due to her questionable values and background. This article explores why Manushi Chillar is not a suitable candidate for the title, focusing on her responses, fashion choices, and the implications of her family background.

The Disgraceful Answer on Motherhood

One of the most troubling aspects of Manushi Chillar's campaign is her response to the question about motherhood. In an interview, she described motherhood as a profession, a statement that was widely criticized as disrespectful to mothers everywhere.

Perhaps surprisingly, Chillar left her medical studies mid-way to pursue this new career. This decision is both perplexing and concerning, especially considering the dedication required in the medical field. A true devotee would not leave anything unfinished, and Chillar's choice to abandon her education was cringe-worthy.

Questionable Fashion Choices

Like many beauty pageant contestants, Manushi Chillar has faced scrutiny for her fashion choices. However, her looks often expose her badly, lacking in the definition of true beauty. The vulgar and revealing outfits she has worn do little to enhance her candidacy or project a positive image. Beauty should be judged on a multitude of factors, and her on-stage attire has been a source of criticism.

The Shocking Family Background

One fact that should raise alarm bells is the background of Manushi Chillar's family. Complicating matters is the fact that she has three siblings, all apparently female. What is truly shocking is that the youngest sibling is male. This fact, coupled with the geographical context of their family, adds a layer of concern.

Chillar came from an area known for the lowest female/male child ratio and notorious for female infanticide. Given these facts, it is crucial to question what her mother or the circumstances were responsible for the survival of a male child. This raises serious questions about the family's backgrounds and ethics.

Implications for Others

The implications of these facts extend beyond Manushi Chillar's personal life. If her background and statements become public knowledge, they will likely be scrutinized again, particularly her parents' responses. The so-called "lollipop answers" of her parents will come under greater scrutiny.

The future of not just this Manushi Chillar but many others like her is at stake. The issue here is not just about an individual but the potential future of many girls in similar situations. It is essential to raise awareness about gender equality and the importance of protecting the rights of all children, regardless of their gender.

Conclusion

Manushi Chillar's candidacy for Miss World 2017 is marred by several issues: her dismissive attitude towards motherhood, her fashion choices that reflect poorly on her, and her family background associated with gender inequality. These factors combined make her an unsuitable candidate for the title. It is crucial to evaluate candidates based on a broader set of values and actions that reflect positively on society and its future.

Therefore, it is only fair and responsible to raise these issues and reassess the suitability of Manushi Chillar for Miss World.