Why Hutterites and Others Reject Television: Rediscovering Independent Thinking and Community Values

Introduction

The decision to ban television is not confined to religious extremists or those in search of religious purity. It has become a thoughtful choice for many highly educated and secular professionals who are seeking to disconnect from mass media and reclaim their lives and the lives of their children. This article explores why the Hutterite community, among others, has chosen to prohibit television in their homes, and the impact of such a decision on their communal values and individual development.

Hutterites: An Amish-like Community

The Hutterite community, a distinct communal religious group, shares many similarities with the Amish. Like the Amish, Hutterites prefer to retain an older way of life in the face of modern society. They speak the old German accent brought from Tyrol, Austria, when they fled persecution. However, what sets them apart is their specific belief system and lifestyle choices that have led them to ban television in their homes.

The decision to forgo television is rooted in the values of the Hutterite community. They believe in living their own lives without the constant influence from outside worlds. Television, in their view, could potentially erode their distinct identity and connection to their community and traditions.

Beyond Hutterites: A Broader Movement

It's not just a Hutterite phenomenon; many highly educated and secular professionals have also chosen to disconnect from television and other forms of mass media. This shift is driven by a desire to avoid the pervasive influence of media on personal lives and the socio-political landscape.

Secular Professionals and the Media:

Secular professionals find themselves inundated with media inputs, from commercial propaganda to political and social indoctrination. These media influences can be overwhelming and may lead to a form of collective thinking without critical examination. Disconnecting from mainstream media allows these individuals to develop their own independent thinking and make informed decisions.

Home Schooling:

Home schooling has also become more mainstream, especially as a means of protecting children from the negative influences of mass media. Though historically associated with religious or overly protective parents, home schooling is now embraced by many who seek to take control of their children's education and shield them from harmful content.

School Shootings and Gang Culture:

Issues such as school shootings, gang culture, and drug abuse are stark reminders that exposure to certain media content can have detrimental effects on young people. By removing this exposure, families can provide a safer and healthier environment for their children to grow and develop in.

The Broader Implications

The move away from television is about more than just media consumption; it's about reclaiming control over one's life and the minds of future generations. Hutterites and others who have chosen to ban television are taking steps towards a more independent and thoughtful society.

Retraining the Mind:

By unplugging from mass media, individuals can retrain their minds to think for themselves. This process involves developing critical thinking skills, which are essential for making informed decisions and understanding the world around them without being swayed by emotional or biased narratives.

Conclusion:

The decision to ban television is a bold and proactive step towards fostering independent thinking and maintaining community values. Whether motivated by religious beliefs, a concern for quality of life, or a desire for stronger familial bonds, this choice is a testament to the profound impact of media on modern society.

As we continue to navigate the complexities of the 21st century, the Hutterite model offers a valuable lesson in the importance of critical thought and community over conformity and mass media influence.

Keywords: