Why Did PM Modi Remain Silent on the Criticisms Amidst Student Plight During the Pandemic?

During India's ongoing battle with the COVID-19 pandemic, critical aspects of governance became especially glaring. One such area has been the institutional and governmental insensitivity towards students, particularly those in remotely situated areas where access to resources remains limited. The case of the Supreme Court's directive to students, despite ongoing remote proceedings, highlights a broader issue of governmental sensitivity and student welfare.

Conflicting Advice and Public Health Risks

At the height of the pandemic, the Indian Supreme Court took a decision that required students to appear in person for their examinations despite the heightened risk of contracting the virus. This directive contravened the logic of remote working practices adopted by many organizations, including the Court itself, and posed significant public health risks to the students and their families. The Court's decision seems to overlook the fact that the number of people attending its sessions is considerably lower than the students who must appear for these exams.

Against this backdrop, Members of Parliament (MPs) and Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) urged students to comply with the Supreme Court's directive, despite their apprehensions regarding safety during assembly and parliamentary sessions. These public figures are "leading by example," thus setting a precedent that may not be in the best interest of students facing unique challenges.

A Silent Prime Minister and Teacher Support

The Indian Prime Minister (PM), Mr. Modi, did not choose to address these concerns publicly. Instead of offering support or guidance, he received a letter from 150 teachers supporting his government's stance. The government's response has been met with criticism, with some labeling it as "Ram Bharose Sarkar," implying a lack of empathy or care. The PM's position has been that if students contract the virus, they must cope, as it is an "Act of God."

However, the government's reliance on the "Act of God" argument seems inadequate, especially given the ongoing availability of testing kits and the existing public health infrastructure. The PM's move towards dismissing the concerns of 150 teachers and persistently concerned parents further adds to questions about the government's prioritization of student welfare in the face of a global health emergency.

Consequences and public outcry

The situation has sparked a public outcry, with numerous parents, students, and teachers voicing their support for reopening examination centers safely while ensuring the welfare of those at risk. There is growing concern that the handling of such a sensitive issue reflects a broader disregard for the needs and safety of marginalized students who may have fewer resources to adapt to the challenges posed by the pandemic.

Several stakeholders, including civil society organizations and educational experts, have called for a more empathetic and effective response. They argue that a responsible government should prioritize public health and student safety, rather than placing the onus on individuals to navigate the complexities of the situation.

Conclusion: A Call for Responsible Governance

In conclusion, the case of student welfare during the pandemic brings to light the importance of responsible governance. It is crucial for policymakers to consider the unique challenges faced by different segments of society and to provide comprehensive support during critical times. The PM's silence on such a significant issue reflects a broader conversation about the need for governments to listen to and address the concerns of their citizens, especially in times of crisis.

The government's response to the plight of students echoes a broader societal understanding of inadequate leadership, leading to calls for a more inclusive and empathetic approach towards governance. As India continues to navigate the pandemic, the importance of prioritizing public health and student welfare remains a pressing concern.