Why Biden Is Given a Free Pass on Alleged Crimes Despite Stronger Evidence Compared to Trump
The topic of alleged crimes by political figures, particularly Joe Biden and Donald Trump, has sparked extensive debate and scrutiny. Some argue that the evidence against the Biden crime family is, in some cases, stronger than that against Trump. However, a critical evaluation is necessary to understand why the justice system is treating these two figures differently.
The Evidence Against the Biden Crime Family
Claims that the evidence against the Biden crime family is stronger than that against Trump require rigorous examination. It is essential to provide concrete examples and reliable sources to substantiate such claims. While some individuals assert that the evidence is stronger, it is important to consider the context and the legal process involved.
Prosecution - watch the spelling. The term should not be conflated with 'persecution.' The justice system is tasked with prosecuting individuals based on the evidence and the law. Current efforts to hold individuals accountable are part of this system. Without credible sources, it is impossible to support the assertion that Biden is receiving a free pass on crimes for which the evidence is stronger.
Justice System's Role in Holding Trump Accountable
The justice system is responsible for ensuring that all individuals, regardless of their political affiliation, are held accountable for their actions. Donald Trump is being held accountable for his various crimes. The prosecutor’s decision to charge Trump with violating New York laws is a result of a thorough investigation and legal process. This is not an endeavor influenced by the Biden administration or any other political entity.
Challenges in Prosecuting Past Crimes
Especially noteworthy is the time it took for the justice system to bring charges against Trump. Some of his crimes were committed decades ago, which raises questions about the delay and the efficiency of the legal process. The argument that the justice system is slow in catching up with Trump does not necessarily invalidate the charges. It reflects a complex interplay of various legal and procedural factors, including evidence preservation, statute of limitations, and the ongoing nature of investigations.
Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation
Recent conspiracy theories, particularly among Trumpublicans, assert that Biden is persecuting Trump. However, such claims are based on misinformation. The decision by the New York County DA to prosecute Trump is a result of the evidence against him, as presented by Pro-Trump sources.
It is important to distinguish between genuine legal actions and baseless speculation. The newly released documents from government efforts to retrieve national defense information from Trump do not mention Biden. Instead, they detail Trump's actions and make allegations against him. It is misleading to suggest that the documents support claims of Biden's involvement in Trump's prosecution. The documents do not validate these conspiracy theories; rather, they present evidence that contradicts such claims.
Constitutional Responsibilities and the Rule of Law
Regardless of political leanings, the responsibility of the executive branch, represented by the President, is to 'take care that the laws be faithfully executed.' Joe Biden, as the current President, has a duty to ensure that laws, including those related to the willful retention of national defense information and obstruction of justice, are obeyed. Targeting Trump for such charges does not imply that Biden himself is engaging in similar actions, but rather that the justice system is functioning as intended.
Conclusion
The claim that the Biden crime family is being given a free pass compared to Trump is an oversimplification. The justice system is focused on holding individuals accountable for their actions. While the evidence against the Biden crime family may be stronger in certain cases, it is essential to provide credible evidence and avoid spreading misinformation. The recent legal actions taken against Trump are a testament to the functioning of the justice system, not an indication of political bias or favoritism.