Why Aren't Members of the NRA Resisting Government Actions in Portland?

Despite claims that the issue is an Australian representation of satirical news, the question of why the National Rifle Association (NRA) members are not actively resisting what some perceive as a tyrannical government action in Portland remains persistent. To address this, we must dispel misconceptions about the NRA's role and motivations.

The Historical Context

"The liberties of the American people were dependent upon the Ballot-box, the Jury-box and the Cartridge-box..." - Frederick Douglass

Frederick Douglass' words ring true, highlighting the importance of the "cartridge box" (or the use of weaponry) as a last resort. The current situation does not warrant such an action, as Douglass would have suggested.

Understanding the NRA's Role

One often hears that the NRA is just a group of tough biker guys, ready to take on enemies at a moment's notice. This is a significant mischaracterization. The NRA, officially known as the National Rifle Association of America, focuses on educational initiatives and advocacy, rather than direct action.

Purposes of the NRA:

Educating people on safe firearm handling. Promoting gun rights and advocating for second amendment protection. Working with politicians to formulate reasonable firearm laws.

It does not control a secret militia or have an army. The NRA is a non-profit organization that aims to support gun rights and educate the public and policymakers.

Addressing the Misconception of Resistance

Some individuals argue that the NRA should be resisting the government's actions in Portland. However, there are several reasons why this is not the case:

Cause and Effect

Gun owners are not spontaneously deciding to protect rioters because they are actively protecting their homes and businesses from the rioters. Gun rights supporters are well aware of the consequences of their actions and understand the repercussions of resisting government actions.

People misunderstand the situation. Rioters are destroying and vandalizing property, placing law-abiding citizens at risk. This is not a case of government tyranny but a clear cause and effect situation. The rioters are engaged in terrorist activities, which logically lead to the deployment of federal law enforcement to protect federal properties and arrest rioters.

Understanding the NRA Members

The NRA is predominantly composed of older members, who do not support insurrection. The cost of membership is not trivial, and NRA members are typically from higher-income backgrounds. This demographic factor contributes to the understanding that gun rights supporters are well aware of the potential for insurrection and the disastrous consequences that would follow.

The NRA and other gun rights supporters are aware of the no-go territory regarding insurrection. Once a shot is fired, there is no turning back. Gun rights supporters understand that challenging the government in this manner would exacerbate the situation and provide even more justification for government intervention.

Conclusion

The NRA and its members recognize the need to respect the rule of law and the due process. The current situation in Portland is a clear case of law-abiding actions, and it is not time for the "cartridge box" to be used, as Douglass would have suggested. The NRA remains focused on education and advocacy within the bounds of the law.

Gun owners understand the power and responsibility that come with their rights. They recognize the importance of peacefully and legally defending their rights and property, rather than resorting to violence and insurrection. The current actions by the government, while controversial, are part of the established legal framework to protect federal properties and ensure public safety.

Understanding the role of the NRA and the motivations of gun rights supporters is crucial in interpreting these events and the overall context of American politics and society.