Why Andrew Yang's Base is Unfairly Opposed By MSNBC

Andrew Yang and his supporters are vehemently opposed to MSNBC, primarily due to the network's perceived biased coverage of his campaign. Yang's base feels that the network has systematically excluded him from fair media treatment, marginalizing his campaign and excluding him from coverage.

The Media Bias Against Andrew Yang

The mainstream media has consistently tried to undermine Andrew Yang's campaign for the Democratic primary. This article will delve into the many instances where Yang feels that he has been unfairly dismissed or sidelined.

One persistent issue is the lack of fair debate coverage. During the debates, Yang claims he was only given a few seconds to speak, and even when he tried to interject, his microphone was reportedly turned off. These practices have led to a sentiment among his supporters that Yang is not being treated as a legitimate candidate. In one instance, during a debate, ten candidates were listed, but only nine were actually present. Yang was conspicuously absent.

Exclusion and Manipulation in Media Coverage

Another area of concern is the manner in which Yang was excluded from debates and featured in polls. Yang's supporters point out that despite consistently poor polling numbers, he was still ranked higher than some of his rivals. When his name started appearing more frequently in polls, the media attempted toToDate and Exclude him. Most notably, when MSNBC started reporting on Yang, they began misreporting his name by calling him John Yang, a fellow CNN reporter. This deliberate confusion is seen as a form of misdirection and unfair media treatment.

Supporters of Andrew Yang have compiled several instances where MSNBC made use of "technical difficulties" to avoid mentioning Yang, or where they were simply left off lists. In one particularly damning example, during a prime-time debate, the network claimed there were ten debate candidates but only showed nine, with Yang notably missing from the lineup.

Conclusion: The Level Playing Field Debate

Yang and his supporters advocate for a merit-based approach to media coverage. They believe that every candidate, regardless of political background, should be given an equal opportunity to participate in debates and be featured in the news. The frustration stems from the feeling that an incumbent advantage, or perhaps even political connections, are favoring some candidates over others.

While Yang may have a niche appeal, particularly among millennials, his base feels that his ideas are being unfairly dismissed. This extension of the level playing field argument highlights the need for fair and unbiased media representation in the political sphere.