Who Would Win in a Batman Battle: Val Kilmer or George Clooney?
Often, the Batman character has been portrayed by a wide array of actors, each bringing their unique flair and interpretation to the caped crusader. While many fans have their own preferences, it's intriguing to consider the viability of comparisons between two less well-received portrayals: Val Kilmer and George Clooney. Neither of these actors is considered a best Batmen in the greater scope of Batman's cinematic history. Let’s delve into the contest and determine who would triumph in a hypothetical battle between the two.
Val Kilmer’s Batman vs. George Clooney’s Batman
The Batman universe is a complex and detailed world, with each actor bringing their own unique take on the character. However, Val Kilmer and George Clooney stand out as two of the weaker performances in the series. Both actors share similarities in their character portrayals, including the use of gadgets, the presence of sidekicks, and the overall level of competence. Additionally, Kilmer and Clooney are, curiously, the same height, with a slight weight advantage to Kilmer. This small physical edge adds a twist to the comparison, but it doesn’t necessarily indicate a clear winner in terms of star power or on-screen ability.
The battle would not be a fair one, given the cutthroat competition among Batman actors, especially with the likes of Christian Bale and Ben Affleck, both of whom would serve as lethal opponents to Kilmer and Clooney. These two actors raised the bar significantly for the role, making any comparison to their struggles even more apparent.
The Case for Val Kilmer
Even in the face of immense challenges, Val Kilmer manages to stand out as the more favorable choice when comparing his take on Batman to Clooney’s. Batman and Robin, one of the most criticized entries in the series, provided a stark contrast to Kilmer's potential. Given the massive backlash from fans and critics alike, it is clear that Kilmer could still have a better claim to the role than Clooney.
One cannot dismiss the fact that Clooney's portrayal is heavily criticized. Batman and Robin is widely regarded as one of the worst films ever made, and the acting, particularly Clooney's, is often pointed out as a significant contributing factor to the film's failure. This means that if Clooney were to read this, he would likely owe the 10 bucks wasted on the movie ticket back to his fans.
Arnold Schwarzenegger and George Clooney
When comparing Clooney to Arnold Schwarzenegger, the situation only gets worse. In Batman Forever, Arnold was allowed to play the role. Given Clooney's talent as a great drama actor, he lacks the appeal required to make a compelling action star. This makes his performance in the film even more compromising, as his character, Can-O, serves as a significant and glaring blunder in the movie.
Thus, despite Clooney's ability to excel in dramatic roles, his choreographed interaction with Batman and the resulting chaos on screen make his portrayal a considerably weaker option when tested against the likes of Schreck and Kilmer.
Concluding Thoughts
While both Val Kilmer and George Clooney brought different elements to the table, the combination of subpar performances and questionable roles leaves much to be desired. Christian and Ben, with their intense and authentic portrayals, stand as the giants in the Batman universe, making any comparison to their achievements difficult. The hypothetical battle between Val and George is far from fair, but it’s clear that Val Kilmer holds a slight edge.