Understanding the Origins and Spread of the Tartarian Conspiracy Theory

Amidst the vast array of conspiracy theories that have gained prominence in recent years, the Tartarian conspiracy theory stands as a particularly controversial and divisive one. Often rooted in historical revisionism and driven by a range of ideological motivations, the theory posits the existence of a large and powerful Tartar-ruled empire known as Tartaria.

Origins and Historical Context

Tartaria has been a term referencing a geographical location in history, most notably associated with Genghis Khan, who was a member of the Tartar ethnic group. However, the contemporary use of the term in conspiracy theory circles differs significantly from its historical understanding. This term was popularized by pseudo-historians and conspiracy theorists who have employed it to bolster Neo-Pagan and Aryan Supremacism ideologies.

The story often told here involves the use of controversial DNA tests and historical revisionism. The theory posits that a powerful Tartar empire existed and governed a vast territory, including much of Central and Eastern Europe. This has been used to challenge the established narrative of the Mongol Yoke, the centuries-long dominance of the Mongol Empire over large portions of this region.

The Role of Alexander Hinievich and Anatoly Fomenko

The theory's intellectual underpinnings are largely attributed to the works of two individuals: Alexander Hinievich and Anatoly Fomenko. Hinievich was a leader within the Neo-Paganism movement, while Fomenko developed the controversial New Chronology theory, challenging traditional historical timelines and narratives.

Fomenko and Hinievich claim that the history of the 13th century, and the subsequent Mongol invasion, is a misinterpretation of historical texts. They propose a fictional empire known as Tartaria, suggesting that the Mongol control was much less extensive than what is generally accepted. This is used to deny the Mongol Yoke and to assert a narrative where Slavic peoples, specifically Russians, are portrayed as a dominant and unconquered force.

Motivations Behind the Conspiracy Theory

The motivations behind the Tartarian conspiracy theory are deeply rooted in emotional and ideological factors. The theory serves several significant purposes for its proponents:

Racism and Supremacism: Proponents of the theory often use it to promote Aryan Supremacism, suggesting that Slavic and specifically Russian peoples are the most ancient and superior race. They argue that all of the world's wisdom and esoteric knowledge comes from these groups. Nationalism: By creating a narrative where the Slavic people were never conquered, but rather stood as a formidable force against invaders, proponents aim to instill a sense of national pride and cultural superiority among the Slavic ethnic groups. Challenge to Historical Authority: Another primary motive is to challenge the historical community, asserting that only certain select individuals have access to the "hidden truth." This fosters a sense of unique insight and superiority among the theory's adherents.

These motivations are not only ideological but also serve to bolster a sense of cultural and historical superiority among those who believe in the theory. They often reject traditional historical accounts and appeal to what they consider to be a more accurate and suppressed version of history.

Conclusion

The Tartarian conspiracy theory, rooted in historical revisionism and steeped in Aryan Supremacism, continues to fascinate and frustrate those who attempt to debunk it. By understanding the origins and motivations behind this theory, one can better comprehend its staying power and its role in shaping modern discourse around ethnicity, nationalism, and historical narratives.

While the theory remains a controversial and divisive subject, it serves as a reminder of the power of ideologically driven narratives in shaping public understanding and belief.