Understanding the Behavior of Tamil Politicians: A Closer Look

The recent behavior of Tamil political figures, particularly those associated with the party led by Seeman, has raised questions about their integrity and the genuine purpose behind their actions. This article delves into the reasons behind the rowdy behavior of these politicians and assesses the credibility of their reforms and initiatives.

Seeman, a prominent figure in Tamil politics, is currently seen as a leader who is more interested in organizing obituary meetings and making extravagant promises than executing meaningful reforms. Critics argue that his desiltation tanks and reforestation projects have become mere rhetoric due to a lack of funding. The supportive base of Sri Lankan Tamils, a crucial financial pillar, has ceased to fund Seeman’s initiatives, leaving his followers struggling to survive.

Rowdy Behavior and Lack of Funding

Seeman and his party members are now more concerned with making a name for themselves in their areas through acts of superficial goodwill. This has led to a shift in their behavior, which is more akin to that of rowdies than responsible leaders. They organize ostentatious events and promises without any real commitment to their causes or projects.

One of the primary reasons behind this rowdy behavior is the lack of funding. As a result, the tangible reforms such as desiltation tanks and reforestation projects have become less noticeable. The funds that Tamils from Sri Lanka used to support Seeman’s initiatives are now a thing of the past, forcing the party to seek alternative methods to gain attention and notoriety in their areas.

Behavior of the Party Leader, Cheemaan

The behavior of the party leader, Cheemaan, further compounds the image of rowdiness in Tamil politics. Cheemaan, a converted Christian, is seen as a leader without integrity and honesty. Critics often question the reason behind a religious conversion from one’s parent religion to another. In Cheemaan’s case, his conversion is attributed to financial incentives rather than genuine spiritual beliefs.

Mr. Cheemaan’s lack of integrity is reflected in his methods of rallies and speeches. Critics observe that his style of speaking is akin to that of a street corner orator rather than a seasoned political speaker. He often resorts to shouting and exaggerated emotional displays to garnered attention. This histrionic behavior is not only disrespectful to the audience but also undermines the seriousness of the party’s message.

Cheemaan's speeches are often described as nonsensical and disconnected from reality. Critics argue that if he had a strong message to convey, it would be clear and convincing. The excessive emotion and exaggerated movements, which are common in his speeches, serve only to distract from the core issues and make the message less credible.

Furthermore, Cheemaan’s leadership of the party called “Naam Thamizhar” (We Tamils) is seen as redundant. Critics argue that it is unnecessary for him to constantly assert his Tamil identity, given that all members of the party are Tamil. This repetitive declaration of identity suggests a lack of genuine purpose or meaningful mission in his political endeavors.

In conclusion, the rowdy behavior and lack of meaningful projects under the leadership of Seeman and Cheemaan reflect a deeper issue within Tamil politics. The party’s reliance on excessive emotional displays and the lack of substantive reforms highlight a failure to address the real needs and desires of the Tamil community. It is crucial for these politicians to demonstrate genuine integrity and commitment to genuine reforms and not just populist and superficial promises.