Understanding White Supremacist Code Talk and Its Impact

White supremacist code talk is a clandestine means of communication that has been used by extremist groups to spread their ideologies and propagate hate. This practice often involves subtle or overt references to racist terminology and symbols, making it difficult for those unfamiliar with the codes to fully understand the extent of the harmful messages being conveyed. Here we explore some key examples and the broader context of these codes within the landscape of contemporary extremism.

Code Talk Examples and Their Significance

The most well-known examples of white supremacist code talk can be found in the use of specific phrases and symbols that bear direct ties to white supremacist ideologies. For instance, the 14 Words attributed to David Lane are a cornerstone of the white supremacist movement: "We must secure the existence of our race and a future for white children." This phrase is often accompanied by a reference to -“"Heil Hitler." This combination of phrases is a direct nod to the hate-filled ideologies that have historically fueled the movement.

Another unsettling example is the use of the code phrase "AYAK/AKIA." This stands for “"Are you a Klansman?” and “A Klansman I am.” This coded language serves as a secret identifier among white supremacist groups, allowing members to signal their allegiance to the cause.

"13/50" and "109/110" are also deeply troubling examples. The first refers to the alleged "13%" of the black population who, according to these groups, commit a disproportionate number of serious crimes. The second, "109/110," suggests the expulsion of Jews from multiple countries, with the implication that it will happen again.

Icons and Symbols Used in Code Talk

Symbols play a significant role in the code talk of white supremacists. For instance, a "German Empire flag." is often used by neo-Nazis in Germany, even though the use of Nazi symbols is strictly banned in the country. The German runes are another example, often taken from their original context to convey a deeply negative and inhuman message. However, it's important to note that not all German runes used by white supremacists are inherently malicious. Many have original meanings that are benign, and the legitimacy of their use as symbols of hate often depends on the context and intent.

Redefining the OK Sign and Its Appropriation

One of the more contentious examples of white supremacist code talk involves the universal “OK” sign. Traditionally recognized as a symbol of goodwill and peace, it has been intentionally misappropriated by white supremacists to send a message of their own malicious intent. By adding their own layer of meaning, they are attempting to subvert the icon's intended symbolism, turning it into a signal that represents their ethnocentric and inhumane beliefs. This act of reappropriation is deeply troubling, as it seeks to overwrite the inclusive and positive imagery that has long been associated with the sign.

This misappropriation of the “OK” sign highlights the broader issue of white supremacists attempting to seize and redefine symbols that are commonly held in high regard by the broader community. It is not simply about reclaiming symbols; it is an insidious effort to imbue these symbols with negative meanings and to marginalize and oppress certain groups.

As a woman of color who has personally experienced the racial injustices of the Jim Crow era in Texas, I can attest to the ways in which white supremacists use hand, head, and body signals as a form of coded communication. The younger generation of white supremacists, including those in positions of power such as law enforcement officers and firefighters, are more frequently using these signals to communicate their views and to engender fear and division. This behavior is deeply troubling and must be addressed with vigilance and a firm commitment to equality and justice.

Conclusion

White supremacist code talk is a dangerous and evolving aspect of extremist ideologies. It involves the use of specific phrases, symbols, and gestures to spread hate and division. By understanding and addressing these practices, we can work to dismantle the hateful underpinnings of these groups and promote a more inclusive and equitable society.

We must be vigilant in recognizing and condemning these forms of coded communication. Only through collective action and a steadfast commitment to justice and equality can we hope to build a world where all individuals can live free from fear and hatred.