Understanding Insurrections: Why 30 People Without Weapons is Not an Insurrection

Insurrections, as defined under the legal and political contexts, involve the organized and violent attempt to overthrow or disrupt governmental authority. In recent history, particularly following the events of January 6, 2021, the term has been often misapplied to small-scale gatherings or peaceful protests. This article aims to clarify the nuances and provide a factual perspective on what constitutes an insurrection.

Watching the January 6 Commission Hearings

One of the most comprehensive examinations of the January 6, 2021, insurrection was through the January 6 Commission hearings. These hearings provided detailed testimonies from police witnesses who offered valuable insights into the events that unfolded that day. The hearings revealed the extent of the violence, the sophisticated planning, and the significant number of individuals involved, many of whom carried weapons.

Factoring in Weapons vs. Lack of Weapons

The presence of weapons can significantly alter the classification of an event. Numerous media outlets might downplay the role of weapons in these events, often underestimating their true significance. However, evidence from investigations, such as that from the January 6 Commission, highlights the presence of firearms and other weapons.

For instance, according to various estimates, the number of gun owners in the United States ranges from 80 to over 100 million. If even half of these individuals were red state conservatives and possessed substantial firearms, the potential for a complete takeover of Washington, DC, would have been substantial. The failure to plan for the use of these weapons indicates a lack of real intent to instigate a genuine insurrection.

Historical Context: Hitler's Putsch and Trump’s Attempt

Historically, insurrections do not necessarily require success or rationality to be classified as such. Examples from the past, such as Hitler’s 1923 Beer Hall Putsch, demonstrate that the mere act of attempting to overthrow governmental authority, regardless of outcome or intent, can be considered an insurrection. Similarly, President Trump’s 2021 attempt to subvert the results of a democratic election was classified as an insurrection due to the substantial efforts to do so, despite their failure.

Thirty People Without Weapons: Not an Insurrection

In the specific context of January 6, the number of individuals involved was several hundred, not 30. These individuals were armed and engaged in extensive and coordinated violence against law enforcement and Capitol guards. The breaking into the Capitol building and efforts to subvert the results of a legitimate election were acts of insurrection.

A group of 30 people without weapons would not be classified as an insurrection. The criteria for an insurrection include organized and violent attempts to overthrow or disrupt governmental authority. For such an event to be qualified as an insurrection, it must involve significant numbers of individuals equipped with weapons and engaged in coordinated acts of violence.

Conclusion

The term insurrection is not to be misused or downplayed, whether by media or anyone else. It carries significant legal and political ramifications. The January 6 hearings provide a clear and detailed account of the events, underscoring the importance of distinguishing between small-scale, peaceful protests and large-scale, coordinated violent acts.

Insurrections are serious and should be recognized and addressed accordingly. Understanding the difference between the two is crucial for ensuring a robust and just democratic system.