The Unpopular Opinions on NCT U: An Analysis
Before delving into the unpopular opinions surrounding NCT U, let's take a moment to admire these talented young artists. Here is a photo of these blessed babies, as the author fondly puts it. NCT U, the boy group from SM Entertainment, is known for its diverse lineup, complex sub-units, and intricate choreography. However, opinions aren't always aligned, and there is often room for discussion and debate. In this article, we explore the author's views, which, while unlikely to be the most popular among fans, offer a unique perspective on the group's dynamics.
Challenges with Vocal Selection and Usage
When it comes to vocal selection, the author of this piece had their fair share of issues. Specifically, criticism arises regarding the concept of 'fitting the song.' This approach, which allows members to participate based on their vocal skills, was scrutinized for its perceived lack of fairness. From the 7th Sense example, the author notes how Haechan, who initially excelled in the demo, was left out of the final track. 'Why was he scrapped?' the author asks, pointing to the notable mismatch in treatment compared to his potential. Similarly, WinWin, who was chosen as the leader of the 90s Love unit, faced minimal to no lines despite SM's decision to utilize him in NCT U songs. The frustration is palpable, reflecting a complex balance between vocal talent and promotional strategies.
Uneven Distribution of Opportunities for Main Members
The question of fairness in the group extends beyond just vocal contributions. Doyoung, Taeil, and Xiaojun became focal points of the author's critique, sparking a debate about the distribution of opportunities among main members. While acknowledging Shotaro's need for additional time, particularly due to his language learning journey, the author believes that Doyoung Taeil, with his excellent singing abilities, deserves more recognition. The author’s contention is that Homeboy (Taeil) should be given the prominence he deserves, as opposed to Doyoung, whose performance in songs like "Make A Wish" does not align with the author's perceived vocal superiority. This division of attention, especially among vocalists with equal talents, is a common topic of discussion among fans, leading to a notable amount of fan rivalry and competition.
Reevaluation of Dance Titles and Responsibilities
The article also highlights the author's dissatisfaction with the distribution of dance positions. The author questions the necessity of every member having a dance title, suggesting that some members are being given roles based on hype rather than accurate skill assessment. This critique is based on the belief that not every member needs to hold a dance title if it is not reflective of their actual capabilities. This perspective challenges the pressure to align every member with a specific role, which can sometimes lead to misallocations of talent and opportunities.
Additional Criticisms and Observations
The author goes on to add that SM Entertainment, while well-intentioned, can overly hype up members, leading to an uneven distribution of opportunities. The author provides specific examples, such as Johnny, whose rapper status seems to be a set-up more than a realistic representation of his abilities. This critique not only pertains to NCT U but also raises broader questions about SM Entertainment's strategy in managing and promoting their artists.
In conclusion, while these opinions might not be popular, they offer valuable insights into the challenges and intricacies involved in managing a complex boy group like NCT U. The focus on fairness, recognition, and equal opportunities highlights the ongoing debates and discussions within the fan community. Whether fans agree with these opinions or not, they serve as a reminder of the multifaceted nature of celebrity dynamics and the importance of considering every member's needs and contributions.