The Truth Behind Prince Harry’s DNA Hesitation: A Scandalous Revelation
Recent whispers and speculations surrounding Prince Harry and his role in preventing a DNA test for his children, Archie and Lilibet, have caught the public's attention. Many have wondered why Prince Harry might be hesitant, and some even suggest it's due to a deeper reason. Let's delve into the truth behind this situation.
Speculation Surrounding the Sussex Royal Family
Reports suggest that Prince Harry is avoiding a DNA test for his two children, a claim that has sparked intense debate. Some theories suggest that Harry might have been engaging in a "faked baby scam," but let's separate fact from fiction. The involvement of false stories about 'Lilibet' and 'Archie' is more fitting for a science fiction story than reality. The names and existence of these children are in question, with Markle reporting a hysterectomy that altogether excludes the possibility of such children.
Markle's Hysterectomy and Sterility
Meghan Markle, now known as The Duchess of Sussex, underwent a hysterectomy 20 years ago. This medical procedure removes the uterus, which plays a crucial role in pregnancy. This fact, confirmed by her father, adds weight to the claims of the children not being Harry's. A hysterectomy does not affect male fertility but precludes any future potential for pregnancy.
Harry's Sterility and Royal Lineage
There are more compelling reasons behind Prince Harry's hesitation. His sterility, confirmed through medical history, poses a significant issue. As a child, Harry reportedly had health problems with his reproductive organs, including surgery and military accidents that allegedly rendered him sterile. This makes the claims about children on the LoS (Line of Succession) and titles invalid, as it would be nearly impossible for Harry to father biological children.
Regulations and Legalities
The importance of a biological parent for a child in the LoS is paramount. For a child to legally inherit titles, they must be born from the spouse of the royal family. With Markle being sterile, any theories involving conceived children through a surrogate parent fall apart. A surrogate would make any child born to them "bastards" or born out of wedlock, not following royal lineage.
Unviable Frozen Ova and Abandoned Children
Even if Markle had frozen embryos, reports indicate that these were not viable. At the age of 30, a hysterectomy is an indication of pre-existing health issues, one of which could be infertility. Reports suggest that she had four children, all of whom were abandoned at birth, and subsequently, surrogates experienced miscarriages. This not only questions the viability of the children but also throws doubt on the legitimacy of the claims involving biological children.
Conclusion
The reasons behind Prince Harry's hesitation reveal a complex mix of medical facts and royal protocol. The involvement of false stories and claims about 'Lilibet' and 'Archie' further distorts the truth. Markle's sterility, coupled with Harry's medical history, paints a picture of children that are nearly impossible to be his. Bringing these children back to the UK would also face the strict scrutiny of any medical tests, which would likely reveal the truth.
As the story unfolds, the public awaits further developments and official statements, hoping to piece together the truth behind this royal family scandal.