The Sussexes and the Royal Family: A Tale of Misunderstanding and Modernization Dreams
It's a common misconception that the Sussexes aimed to modernize the British Royal Family. However, their journey and ultimate departure have more to do with a clash of expectations and understanding of the role they were to fulfill. This article explores the complexities of modernization efforts and the inherent traditions that the Royal Family must adhere to.
The Essence of Traditionalism
The British Royal Family exists as a representation of over 1000 years of history, tradition, and stability. Their role is not to change with the times but to serve as a constant reminder of the enduring values and practices of their country. To suggest otherwise is to miss the core purpose of their existence. Any attempt to 'modernize' would disrupt centuries of established customs and institutions.
The Misperception of Modernization
Queen Elizabeth II and her consort, Prince Philip, maintained a traditional stance throughout their reign, with no desire for fundamental changes. Their children, Diana, Prince Charles, and Princess Anne, have each brought their own perspectives to the monarchy, but none sought to change the inherent framework of the institution. The expectations for any future spouses of the royal children are also strictly limited.
The Sussexes' Misunderstanding
When Meghan Markle and Prince Harry joined the Royal Family, they projected themselves to be at the forefront of a modernization effort. They believed they could bring a new dynamic and commercial appeal to the royal institution. However, their actions and decisions were often influenced by a lack of understanding of the rules and traditions they were required to follow.
Financial Independence and Communication Strategies
David McClure, a royal finance expert, has noted that many of the Sussexes' decisions before leaving the royal family were motivated by a desire for financial independence. Establishing their own press office at Frogmore Cottage in Windsor was an additional financial burden. They had access to a shared communications team with Prince William and Catherine at Kensington Palace until October 2018.
They left the previous system due to dissatisfaction with the constraints and rules imposed by the media. They hoped for provisions that would allow them to be funded for a year, with the assumption that security would be covered in the United States. These expectations were never officially confirmed, leading to significant disappointment and ultimately their departure.
Blaming the Institution, Not Individuals
The Sussexes felt a personal affront when they were not given the same level of parity as Prince William and Catherine. This led to criticisms and statements that inadvertently placed blame on the institution, including the Queen herself. It's important to note that any criticism of an institution typically reflects on those in charge or at the helm, similar to how criticism of Disney would reflect on its CEO.
The royal family's decisions and actions are heavily influenced by tradition and centuries-old rules. This is not a 'missed opportunity' for modernization, but rather a reflection of the institution's unwavering dedication to preserving its heritage and values.
Moving Forward and Future Changes
Despite the missteps and misunderstandings, the Royal Family will continue to evolve. Changes and modernizations are happening gradually, with each generation bringing new perspectives to the institution. It is hoped that these changes will lead to a more inclusive and understanding representation of the British monarchy.
Countess Sophie and Lady Louise, close relatives to the Queen, offer hope for future modernizations. They embody a blend of traditional values and modern sensibilities, setting a path for the future of the Royal Family.
In conclusion, while the Sussexes' intentions might have been noble, their approach to modernization was misinformed and often impractical. The Royal Family must maintain its traditions and values, ensuring that its role as a symbol of British heritage and stability is preserved.