The Return to the Middle Ages: The Dangers of Public Opinion as Law
The title suggests a comparison between the modern era and the Middle Ages, where public opinion was not just a guideline, but the law. This article argues that the increasing influence of public opinion and certain activist movements in today's society bears a striking resemblance to the oppressive nature of public opinion in the middle ages. We'll explore how practices and ideologies reminiscent of medieval times are creeping back into modern policy and culture.
Returning to a Time of Ignorance and Superstition
The period known as the Middle Ages, or the Dark Ages, spanned from the 5th to the 15th century. This era is often characterized by ignorance and superstition, where the word of religious authorities was paramount. Scientific data and reason were often overlooked in favor of religious dogma. A specific example of this is the trial of Galileo Galilei, who was judged for heresy and forced to recant his findings that the Earth revolved around the sun. Similarly, today, new versions of the Middle Ages are emerging, marked by an overreach of public opinion and certain activist movements.
a New Kind of Religious Fanaticism
The new form of religious fanaticism is being driven by movements such as New Age activism, which includes ultra-feminism, the #MeToo movement, and non-binary movements. These groups are gaining political power at an alarming rate, pushing legislation and intimidating anyone who dares to dissent. Just as the Catholic Church once did, these movements push a strict orthodoxy, demanding complete agreement from all individuals. Non-compliance often results in public humiliation and loss of livelihood.
Examples of Public Opinion as Law
One example is the pressure on businesses and individuals to recognize non-binary gender options, despite the fact that they only represent a small percentage of the population. Another example is the shunning of works of art or literature that are deemed offensive by these activist groups. Classic paintings and renowned artists are subjected to renaming or total censorship.
Gender and Scientific Reality
The new activism is also challenging long-held scientific realities. For instance, gender is often presented as non-binary, disregarding the binary nature of biological sex. Biological sex is determined by the presence of X and Y chromosomes, leaving no room for a non-binary category. Females are defined by two X chromosomes, and males by one X and one Y. Attempting to reduce gender to a fashion item is a clear example of the logic lacking in this new version of activism.
The Consequences of Suppression
The suppression of dissent and the imposition of political correctness can have severe consequences. Individuals who do not conform to the new orthodoxy can face social ostracism and legal repercussions. Such actions are akin to the actions of the Catholic Church during the Middle Ages, where speaking out against religious doctrine could result in public humiliation, torture, and even death.
The Renaissance and the Enlightenment
Historically, following the Dark Ages, the Renaissance and the Enlightenment periods saw a rebirth of humanism, reason, and scientific advancement. During these times, the emphasis was on human rights, freedom of speech, and the separation of church and state. Today, we have an opportunity to rebel against the new orthodoxy and move towards a society based on human collaboration and progress rather than enforced conformity and fear.
The article concludes by encouraging readers to resist entering a new version of the Middle Ages and instead choose to embrace love, peace, and collaboration for a better future.