The Reason Behind Duncan MacLeod’s Choice in Highlander: Endgame
In the movie Highlander: Endgame, Duncan MacLeod's decision not to use both his sword and Connor MacLeod's sword against Jacob Kell during their final battle has sparked considerable discussion and speculation. Let's delve into the factors that guided this decision and explore the themes of honor, character development, and practicality.
Honor and Tradition
The Highlander series often emphasizes the importance of honor in combat. The concept of a one-on-one duel is deeply rooted in the code of conduct among immortals. Using two swords might be seen as dishonorable or against this traditional mentality. This is a critical aspect of Duncan's character, as his actions are guided by a strong sense of honor. By adhering to the one sword rule, Duncan maintains his integrity and the respect of his peers.
Character Development
Duncan MacLeod's character arc throughout Highlander: Endgame focuses on his growth and the acceptance of his fate. Engaging in a fair fight with Jacob Kell aligns with his values, particularly his maturity and wisdom in embracing his destiny. Using two swords would have undermined the personal and emotional nature of their clash, which serves to deepen the audience's connection with the character.
Storytelling
From a narrative perspective, the filmmakers likely wanted to create a dramatic and intense showdown. A single sword fight allows for more focused character interactions and emotional stakes, enhancing the climactic moment of the film. The tension and intensity of the single sword duel contribute to the overall cinematic experience, making the final battle more impactful.
Practicality
In a real combat scenario, wielding two swords could complicate movement and defense. Duncan's choice to use a single sword relies on his skill and experience, ensuring that he can navigate the battlefield effectively. The choice simplifies the dynamics of the fight, making it more realistic and the outcome more dependent on the characters' abilities rather than the number of weapons they wield.
Why Not Fight Together?
One could argue that, given Jacob Kell's tendency to break the rules, Duncan and Connor might have had an advantage by fighting together. Kell has indeed broken numerous rules throughout the movie without any visible consequences, suggesting that the rules are more fluid than they appear.
However, the St. Cloud immortals breaking the rules without repercussions, and the fact that Kell broke even the "no fight on holy ground" rule without penalty, might not have been enough to justify the sudden change in Duncan and Connor's behavior. This inconsistency in rule enforcement suggests that the rules are not as strictly adhered to as the audience is made to believe.
Additionally, the four Horsemen in the comics did not hesitate to attack and crush the Kurgan together, indicating that working together is not an unprecedented strategy. However, the St. Cloud immortals' use of mortals as allies highlights that a team approach might be a valid strategy under certain circumstances.
Lastly, in Highlander 3, Kane decided to flee when he could have taken Connor's head due to the risk of breaking the "no fight on holy ground" rule. This suggests that the potential consequences of breaking the rules might be more significant than they initially appear, even if immediate repercussions are not evident.
Ultimately, Duncan MacLeod's choice to use one sword in Highlander: Endgame is a multifaceted decision influenced by honor, character development, storytelling, and practicality. The decision not to violate the established rules, even against a seemingly invincible foe, underscores the complexity of the characters and the story's deeper themes.