The Reality of Racism and Its Bias Against People of Color (POC)

The Reality of Racism and Its Bias Against People of Color (POC)

The notion that racism is a one-way street, predominantly directed against people of color (POC), is a misconception that has deep implications in modern society. This article explores the systemic biases and power dynamics that make it nearly impossible for POC to experience racism against white individuals. Instead, white individuals wield significant power, privilege, and control over POC, making the idea of reverse racism against white people virtually nonexistent.

The Absence of Racism Against White People

It is a fact that the concept of racism against white people is almost non-existent. This emerges from a complex tapestry of social, political, and historical factors. Traditionally, white people, particularly those with light skin, have benefited from systemic colorism, which has shielded them from the discrimination faced by others. This dynamic is further entrenched by the absence of non-white supremacist ideologies that carry significant cultural and social weight globally.

Power, Privilege, and Cultural Influence

The assertion that racism against white people is rare or impossible stems from several key points:

No Equal Power and Privilege: POC do not have an equal power structure as white people. There is no "Asian supremacy" or "black supremacy" with teeth; the idea of minority groups forcing their cultures, values, and beauty standards on the world is largely dismissed. Any non-white version of white supremacy is met with scorn or derision. Control Over Relationships: In relationships, particularly romantic ones, POC must often go the extra mile to date white people. Non-white men might face rejection based on their genetics, while non-white women must be extraordinarily attractive to be desired by white men. Financial status also plays a role, further illustrating the power dynamics involved. Dateability and Power: White people have far more dating options and encounter fewer barriers in forming relationships. They can reject any potential partner who has given them attention and still achieve reproductive success. This highlights the significant power and privilege that white individuals possess.

Genetic and Cultural Influence

The genetic and cultural landscape also contributes to the imbalance between white and non-white individuals. A large proportion of the population, especially in Western countries, has a more "white" appearance due to extensive intermingling over generations. Meanwhile, POC in non-white majority countries often find it challenging to date within white-majority countries, further emphasizing the power dynamics.

Race and Control

Data and preferences are crucial in understanding the control exerted by white individuals. POC who do not conform to white standards of beauty or relationship preferences are seen as "racist" simply for existing. White people want to control the preferences and choices of POC, asserting their dominance even when those POC choose their own paths.

Cultural and Systemic Implications

The desire for control and elimination of POC who do not conform to white standards reflects a deeply entrenched system of white supremacy. This belief is rooted in the idea that all aspects of human life, including culture, relationships, and even human rights, should belong to the white race. This ideology is not only racist but also diminishes the inherent value and rights of all individuals.

White people want to control human individuality, free will, and relationships to the extent that it eliminates racism in their minds. However, this control is not justified and goes against the principles of human rights and equal opportunity. This imbalance highlights the need for systemic change and awareness to address the underlying biases and power structures in society.

Finally, it is crucial to recognize that white people are not God and do not have the right to create or define individuals in their image. The natural control that white people have over societal structures should not be confused with the inherent rights and dignity of all individuals.