The Origins and Consequences of European Inferiority Complex towards Sub-Saharan Africans
The perception of Africans as inferior by Europeans has been a deeply entrenched narrative that has influenced global perceptions and interactions for centuries. By 'Africans,' it is important to refer to sub-Saharan Africans, a term that excludes the North African populations who share primarily Middle Eastern and Mediterranean gene pools but have historically identified and named their continent.
Historical Context and Propaganda
The complex of inferiority among Europeans stems from historical grievances and a need to assert their status in the hierarchical structure of civilizations. During the Age of Enlightenment, Europeans were essentially the last major group to emerge in written historical records, leading to a sense of inadequacy and a desire to reclaim a legacy of intellectual and cultural superiority.
The propagation of this idea was not purely academic but was part of a larger campaign aimed at boosting European morale and justifying their actions, such as colonial expansion and slavery. This propaganda was used to 'soothe the fragile ego' of a people who felt they were inferior to other civilizations that had written historical records.
Sub-Saharan Africans' Cognitive Capabilities and Beyond
Recent research and historical accounts challenge the notion that Sub-Saharan Africans possess inferior cognitive abilities compared to Europeans and Asians. Scientific studies demonstrate that the cognitive capabilities of Sub-Saharan Africans are on par with those of other populations, be it in logical tasks, emotional regulation, or any other mental functions.
The question then arises: if these populations are on equal footing in terms of cognitive abilities, what differentiates them in non-economic areas such as sports, entertainment, sex, fighting, relationships, and interpersonal skills? The specific areas like athletics, entertainment, and interpersonal communication play a significant role in socio-economic success. These variables can sway the decision-making process, such as who a woman might choose to reproduce with, given two equally qualified candidates.
Non-Economic Factors and Sociocultural Success
For instance, in a scenario where a Westernized Indian working in Silicon Valley and his Westernized Nigerian colleague are comparable in socio-economic and cultural standing, the performance in the bedroom could become a crucial factor. Elements like sports performance, entertainment abilities, interpersonal skills, and even levels of testosterone could influence which individual might be chosen for reproduction.
Similar considerations apply to black women. Their physical attributes and nurture can place them in a more desirable position, even if the majority can reproduce. The most attractive females, however, have a wider range of options and can thus attract better quality partners for more frequent meetings.
Relationships and the Structure of Society
On the relationship front, successful Black men are more likely to marry good-quality, well-adjusted, and nurturing Black women. This arrangement ensures that the next generation views the world from a Black perspective. Despite racial differences, these dynamics are more class-based than purely racial, reinforcing the idea that success can be achieved through societal structures and personal attributes.
The core belief that drives success or failure is rooted in the idea that Black people must not believe they can achieve. This assertion is a control mechanism that perpetuates an unnatural order. As long as this belief is maintained, the inferiority complex persists, hindering the true potential of sub-Saharan Africans from being fully realized.
In conclusion, the perceptions and beliefs that sustain the inferiority complex are critical to understanding the sociocultural dynamics between different populations. By challenging these beliefs and promoting equality based on capability and merit, a more balanced and fair society can be achieved.