When Did the Internet Think It Had So Much Power?
The internet, as a global network of computers and routers, does not possess any inherent power. However, the perception that the internet has power to 'cancel' people has become widespread. This article explores the history of cancel culture, the role of the internet in facilitating this phenomenon, and why certain private companies have the power to ban users rather than the internet itself.
The Internet and Social Media Power
It's important to recognize that the people on social media who believe they have power to 'cancel' others are the true force behind this phenomenon. While the internet serves as a platform for this, it is the individuals who leverage its reach to spread their message. Such actions have proven to be highly effective in the past, with the power to spread information rapidly across the globe.
Understanding the Misconception
The key point here is to differentiate between the internet's role and the actions of individuals who use it. The internet itself does not have any power; it is merely a tool. Certain services on the internet can ban people based on terms and conditions that prohibit inappropriate behavior. This is not the internet canceling people, but rather private companies enforcing their policies.
A case in point is former US President Donald Trump. Despite numerous attempts by various platforms to silence him, his supporters rallied and formed their own web presence. However, the lack of interest from the public led to the collapse of Trump's alternative platforms. Similarly, if someone posts something that goes against the terms and conditions of a platform, they will be removed, not because the internet has power, but because the private company hosting the platform does.
The Historical Context of Cancel Culture
The concept of 'canceling' people is not new. Societies have been canceling individuals and groups for centuries. Before the rise of the internet, there were news groups and flame wars that served as precursors to today's cancel culture. While the internet has certainly amplified these behaviors, the root of the issue lies in human nature and the way people interact with each other.
Personal Reflection and Civil Disengagement
Paul's answer rightly points out that the internet is not the problem; rather, it is the people who misuse it. Engaging in cancel culture effectively silences those who disagree, preventing them from learning and growing. However, the ultimate power lies with the individual. If someone chooses to ignore insults and unilaterally decides to disengage from such negativity, they are the one who has the final say.
For example, you may choose not to engage with content from organizations aligned with ideologies you disagree with, such as Koch Industries. This act of choosing not to support them is a form of personal, sovereign decision-making, not an attempt to 'cancel' the company. It is a reflection of capitalism and the American way.
A Call for Self-Reflection and Rational Debate
The only person who can truly 'cancel' you is yourself through unreasonable actions or decisions. In the face of criticism or disagreement, self-reflection is essential. If you engage in an honest and rational reflection, you may find that you need to adjust your stance. If, after such reflection, you feel strongly about your position, then continue to stand by it respectfully.
In my long-time engagement with the internet, from its early days on BBS to the current era, I have always valued respectful and informed discourse. By engaging face-to-face with those who hold differing views and expressing my points with a smile, I can maintain a rational and civil atmosphere.
In conclusion, the internet is merely a tool that amplifies our voices and actions. The true power lies in the hands of the user, who must take responsibility for their interactions and decide where and how they wish to engage.