The Digital and Analog Scientists: How PhD Lab Notebooks Evolve

Every PhD journey is a unique odyssey, and for many aspiring researchers, the laboratory notebook is an essential part of their toolkit. This article explores the nuances of how PhD lab notebooks are used and the evolution of these records, delving into both digital and traditional methods. Whether you prefer a digital log or a physical notebook, the goal remains the same: to capture and organize the intricate details of your scientific endeavors.

Traditional Methods: The Analog Notebook

Many early adopters of the scientific process rely on traditional, physical notebooks. This preference for analog record-keeping reflects a deep-seated belief that writing things by hand helps clarify thought patterns and fosters a deeper understanding of experimental details. This is especially true for individuals who find it easier to engage with complex ideas through the tactile process of writing. As one PhD student noted, 'Sometimes I find it easier to think about things when I physically write them down. It’s like the act of writing helps to solidify my thoughts.'

Modern Methods: Digital Logging with OneNote

While the physical notebook remains a cherished tool, many researchers turn to digital platforms for more convenient and organized record-keeping. One such platform gaining popularity is Microsoft OneNote. A PhD student in the field described their experience using OneNote: 'I actually have two notebooks for research. One is a physical notebook, which I mostly use for writing things down or diagramming ideas to help me clarify my thoughts. The main research log I use though is a computer-based OneNote notebook with sections like Weekly Notes, Project Overview, Software, Hardware, and Long Term.'

OneNote in Action: A Case Study

Most notably, Weekly Notes are an extensive section that captures a running checklist of tasks. This weekly log serves as a critical reference point for researchers, containing short notes on results, thoughts, plans, and more. Every couple of weeks, or whenever the page becomes too cluttered to be readable, a new page is created. The previous page’s content is transferred over, and completed tasks are erased. This system allows the user to distinguish between tasks completed and those still pending, making it a dynamic and efficient record-keeping tool.

'This bit would be harder to replicate on a physical notebook,' notes the student. 'Having a digital solution allows for easy organization and accessibility. The ability to search for specific notes or phrases is invaluable when you need to refer back to detailed findings or concept discussions.'

Integration of Reading Notes and Experimenting

OneNote is not solely a tool for organizing tasks and experiments. It is a comprehensive repository for Notes from reading, diagrams, and plans for both experiments and publications. Meeting notes, reviewer comments on papers, and responses to them are also seamlessly integrated into the system, providing a holistic view of the research progress and insights.

'It’s quite extensive and I rely on it a lot,' the student reiterates. 'From the minimum daily checking and summarization to long-term strategic planning, OneNote is instrumental in maintaining the flow of research and keeping everything organized.'

Conclusion: Balancing Analog and Digital Tools

The evolution of PhD lab notebooks reflects a broader shift in scientific research methodologies. While physical notebooks remain cherished, digital platforms offer unparalleled convenience and organization. The choice between the two ultimately depends on personal preference and the specific requirements of the research project. Whether you prefer the tactile experience of a physical notebook or the efficiency of a digital log, the key is to find a tool that best suits your needs and enhances your research capabilities.