The Cost of Royal Security: A Deeper Look at Meghan and Harry’s Protection in the US
When Prince Harry and Meghan Markle decided to move to California, the world was fascinated by the luxury and safety measures the royal couple would enjoy. However, many critics argue that a significant portion of these security costs could be better used to address more pressing global issues. This article elucidates the true cost of royal security and explores why this expenditure raises eyebrows.
The True Cost: Breaking Down the Expenditure
It is no secret that the cost of royal security is astronomical. A notable Hollywood security firm, known for its expertise in safeguarding A-list celebrities, is the chosen provider for the couple. Sources reveal that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have offered a seven-figure sum to a security expert named Kris Herzog from Bodyguard Group based in Beverly Hills.
The security firm has extensive experience in protecting celebrities, including Hollywood stars like Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. However, the royal couple is demanding more than mere celebrity protection. They are willing to spend considerable sums to triple their existing budget, ensuring bulletproof cars, doubling the staff number, and even bringing in former FBI agents for constant surveillance. Additionally, intelligence agencies are being utilized to investigate potential threats.
The Financial Implications for the Royal Family
While these security measures might seem extravagant, one must consider the financial capabilities of Prince Charles and the Queen. Prince Charles, unlike the wealthy celebrities, has an annual income of around $20 million, and even that amount is subject to taxes. Beyond his regular expenses, he supports charities, pays for the home and office, and covers the costs for his two sons and their respective families, staff, and other expenses. This leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to the lavish security costs for the royal couple.
Despite the significant financial burden, the royal family has responded differently. Prince Charles initially refused to support this move, citing financial concerns. The royal couple may need to cover these expenses themselves, which is a challenge given the modest financial situation of Prince Charles.
The Transition to Independence
On March 31, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police confirmed it would stop providing protection to the couple. It is unclear who will foot the bill for the new security measures. The Queen and Prince Charles might cover these expenses, but with their limited resources, this would be a substantial burden. Alternatively, the royal couple might be responsible for these costs, which would further strain their financial stability.
Extreme Measures for Archie’s Safety
The royal family has taken no chances when it comes to Archie’s safety. His personal security detail is much more extensive, including self-defense and kidnapping prevention training for when he grows older. Resources are allocated to ensure that Archie is educated in various survival and escape techniques, with some of the world's top experts involved in his training. This level of protection sets a new standard for the security of royal offspring.
Controversial Reactions and Public Critique
While these security measures might seem necessary to ensure the safety of the royal family, many feel that such expenditures could be better directed towards more pressing global issues. For instance, concerns over electoral hacking, environmental degradation, and women's rights violations receive significantly less attention and funding compared to the protection costs for the royal couple.
Many argue that the public should focus their efforts and resources on these critical issues, rather than wondering about the expenses associated with protecting strangers in royalty. This debate underscores the ongoing tension between maintaining security and utilizing resources more equitably to address global concerns.
Conclusion
The cost of royal security for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle is a subject of ongoing public debate. The numerous security measures and the associated financial burden raise questions about the prioritization of resources. While the need for security is undeniable, it is essential to consider alternative uses for these funds, particularly in light of other pressing global issues.