Should Jared Kushner's Security Clearance Be Revoked Over Alleged Massive Debt?

Introduction

The article published on February 15, 2018, posed the question of whether Jared Kushner's security clearance should be revoked due to allegations of massive personal debt. One year later, with the ongoing investigations and the lack of indictments, it's crucial to examine the credibility and implications of this claim.

Assessing the Context

The source of the article, Salon, is often viewed as a left-leaning and opinionated platform. This bias can skew perspectives and misreport facts. Nonetheless, the Salon article raises significant questions about the reliability of the source and the truthfulness of the allegations against Jared Kushner. The following points aim to provide a balanced and fact-based analysis.

Sources and Reliability

First, it's important to consider the reliability of the source. Salon is known for its left-leaning views and often perpetuates a narrative against the Republican Party and the right side of the political spectrum. Even centrist sources tend to lean towards a right-wing bias. This bias can lead to selective reporting and misleading headlines. Furthermore, a headline does not always match the content of the article.

Second, let's look at the actual article. Salon can be a source of opinionated pieces, but it is crucial to examine the claims presented within the article critically. Often, the headline may not accurately represent the content of the article. In this context, while the headline suggests a serious accusation, the article itself may not fully substantiate the claim of massive debt.

Understanding Security Clearances

To understand the implications of revoking a security clearance, it's essential to recognize that a temporary clearance is sufficient to maintain government operations during the research and issuance of an official clearance. This temporary clearance is standard practice and ensures that government functions are not disrupted.

Assessing the Allegations

The article frames the question in terms of alleged massive debt. Let's reframe the question to analyze the broader implications. Questions such as:

Should your right to vote be revoked because of alleged treason? Should your liberty be revoked because of alleged illegal activities? Should your children be removed because of alleged abuse? Should your job be terminated because of alleged illegal activities?

This reframing highlights the pattern of unfair judgments based on alleged, not proven, activities. Such practices are a stark deviation from the principles upon which the U.S. was founded, including the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.

The Importance of Due Process

The U.S. constitutional principles, including the right to due process, are paramount. Revoking someone's security clearance should be a serious and documented matter, based on proven evidence rather than mere allegations. The incident of a teenager wearing a MAGA hat being falsely accused and persecuted exemplifies the dangers of jumping to conclusions without evidence.

It is crucial to reflect on the circumstances of the presidential election and its aftermath. Allegations without evidence can be damaging and can result in wrongful persecution. The media plays a significant role in perpetuating these narratives and should be held accountable for any misinformation.

Conclusion

Two years after the initial article, with the ongoing investigation, it is clear that the allegations of massive debt, which are alleged, must be proven. Revoking a security clearance should be a matter of documented evidence and a thorough investigation. Any steps towards revoking a clearance based on alleged activities are a misalignment with the principles of due process and the U.S. legal system.