The Return to Traditional Values in Putin's Russia
The discourse surrounding Russian values has shifted dramatically under the leadership of President Vladimir Putin. A few years ago, the question of Russia's return to traditional values under Putin seemed relevant. However, as Putin’s term continues, the focus has shifted to the eventual decline of his leadership and the potential return of these traditional values.
A Return to Brutal Autocracy and Other Traditional Values
Under Putin's tenure, Russia has undeniably moved towards a return to its traditional values, characterized by brutal autocracy, unbridled corruption, aggressive imperialism, medieval religiosity, and an underdeveloped economy. Young, educated, and liberal individuals have been fleeing the country, and relations with Western trading partners have become strained. The future for Russia appears bleak as a result.
These traditional values are rooted in historical extremes, from the brutal reigns of figures like Genghis Khan and Ivan the Terrible to the more recent oppressive regime under Putin. The current leadership's vision is part of a larger narrative of regression into a regime reminiscent of the dark ages.
The Ideological Underpinning: Traditionalism
The ideological framework driving Russia's current trajectory is rooted in a form of Traditionalism, an ultra-conservative and nationalist philosophy that rejects the principles of individualism, humanism, human rights, democracy, and progress. This form of Traditionalism is personified in the actions of Alexander Dugin, Putin's disciple, who advocates for a return to ancient and medieval religious practices while promoting a totalitarian central authority.
The ideology attracts Putin for its autocratic leanings and its embrace of materialism, despite his Marxist roots. This conflicting embrace of traditional and modern principles is a critical flaw in the system, as it strains the facade of authority and purpose.
The Obstacles to a Thousand-Year Reich
While the vision of a thousand-year Reich may seem appealing, the reality is much more complex and problematic. The boldest aspects of the Traditionalist agenda, such as promoting cultic Orthodoxy, Islam, and the concept of a spiritual Eurasian people, are difficult to implement without fail. These traditional values do not equate to a seamless and stable governance structure.
The issues of imperialism, economic underdevelopment, and widespread poverty will persist and will likely exacerbate social and political tensions. Furthermore, the vision of a unified spiritual state that transcends modern boundaries is an elusive goal. As history has shown, such regimes often fail to deliver on their promises and instead become oppressive and unstable.
Conclusion
The return to traditional values under Putin's Russia is a stark departure from the progressive aspirations once thought to be within reach. As the country moves further away from the ideals of democracy and human rights, the future of Russia under post-Putin leadership remains uncertain. The question of whether Russia can build a stable, prosperous, and inclusive society without returning to these traditional values is one that future generations will need to answer.
It is important to continue monitoring the political landscape in Russia and the ideological movements that underpin Putin's vision to better understand the challenges and opportunities for the country's future.