Reflections on Richard Gere Being a Father at 69

Reflections on Richard Gere Being a Father at 69

The headlines frequently raise questions about the implications of older parents, often focusing on the challenges and concerns that come with them. A recent example is the discussion around Richard Gere's decision to become a father at the age of 69. Many opinions have been voiced, but the core of the debate revolves around the societal norms, ethical considerations, and potential outcomes for both the parent and the child.

The Argument Against

The argument against Richard Gere's decision as a father is often framed in terms of ageism and fairness towards his child. Some argue that 69 is too old to bear the responsibilities of parenting, particularly when the child is still in their early twenties. For instance, Cory Overstreet wrote: "He’s too old! It’s unfair to his child that he’ll be dead before the child is 30." This sentiment reflects the common concern that older parents may not have the physical or emotional stamina required for the long-term care of their children.

The Argument For

However, there are those who see no inherent problem with an older individual becoming a parent. They argue that age should not be the defining factor in the quality of life or the ability to provide parental guidance. One such viewpoint entails that if Mr. Gere is still active and engaged at 69, this could be seen as a positive. This perspective was echoed by an anonymous contributor who posed the question: "If Mr. Gere is still spry and sassy at age 89, good on him." This suggests that physical and mental well-being are more important indicators of a good parent than age alone.

Ethical Considerations

While age is often the primary focal point in such debates, ethical considerations also come into play. The decision to become a parent later in life can raise questions about the well-being of both the parent and the child. For instance, age-related health concerns could pose risks to the child. A comment by Cory Overstreet succinctly captures this concern: "Are you kidding me! Can you see his child when he or she is 10 asking Daddy to play outside? Better break out the BINGO because 79 is not hide and go seek age or dodge ball. He could break a leg if hit by the ball at that age." This highlights the potential for age-related limitations to impact the safety and enjoyment of family interactions.

Conclusion

The debate over Richard Gere being a father at 69 reflects a broader conversation about the role of age in parental responsibility. While ageism is a significant factor, it is crucial to consider the health and well-being of both the parent and the child. Ethical considerations, such as the ability to provide for the child's needs and ensure their safety, should also guide these decisions. Ultimately, the decision to become a parent later in life is a deeply personal one that should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, taking into account individual circumstances and well-being.