Personal Insights on President Biden's Observations of January 6th Insurrection

President Biden's observation that the January 6th insurrection wasn't an insurrection because the rioters lacked the complex military capabilities required underscores a critical insight into political change and armed conflicts.

Understanding the Insurrection from a Tactical Perspective

The January 6th insurrection may have been a significant rallying point for those disillusioned with the political system, but it lacks the sophistication and capabilities of a well-trained and well-armed military force necessary to challenge the US government effectively.

For instance, President Biden was correct when he pointed out that an F-16 would be more than an F-35 or any small arms. An effective insurrection or takeover would require a sophisticated, well-armed, and well-trained military force. The notion that a small group of undisciplined ex-military and wannabes with small arms and zip ties could succeed against the United States government is highly improbable.

Armed Groups and Their Limitations

Wishful thinking aside, there are vast numbers of qualified veterans, combined with the resources of agencies like the CIA, FBI, IRS, and military, would ensure that any attempt to overthrow the government would be met with overwhelming force. As my former friend, who championed a far-right movement, once explained, if your plan relies on firearms and constitutional rights alone, it's more likely to end in arrest or violence.

Historical Precedents: The Branch Davidian Siege

The Siege of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, provides a stark example of the futility of such endeavors. Despite being heavily armed, the Branch Davidians could not stand up to the combined force of federal agents, state troops, and advanced technology. The outcome was tragic, with many lives lost, and the majority being children. This underscores the resources and capabilities required to defend against a government with overwhelming power.

Lawful Change Through Elections and Politics

For any significant change to occur in the United States government, it must be achieved through lawful means, such as elections and healthy political discourse. The insurrection on January 6th was more about political chaos and disruption than it was about overthrowing the government. Even if the insurrectionists had managed to stop the counting of electoral votes, kill key officials, or prevent the departure of the president, the US government would still maintain its democratic processes.

So, the conclusion is clear: lawful means and organized political efforts are the appropriate avenues for those seeking to change the government. Armed resistance or insurrection is not only illegal but also impractical, given the scale and resources of the US military and law enforcement agencies.

Reflecting on these historical events and insights, it's crucial to understand the reality of political challenges and the necessity of adhering to the democratic processes and constitutional rights that make the United States resilient and secure.