Paternity Fraud: Legal Penalties and Public Policy

What Should Be the Legal Penalties for Paternity Fraud?

The debate surrounding paternity fraud has been a contentious issue, often leading to discussions about appropriate legal penalties. This article delves into the proposed legal measures and evaluates the effectiveness of suggested fines and imprisonment.

Proposed Legal Penalties

A proposed legal penalty for paternity fraud includes an automatic prison sentence, equal to the number of years the "father" was forced to care for a child that was not his, plus a base sentence of five years. This is coupled with criminal coerce entrapment, theft, and the traumatic emotional damage inflicted on the man due to the accuser's actions.

Alternative Suggestions: Fines and Court Costs

Another suggestion involves treating paternity fraud as a misdemeanor, with fines up to $1,000. Under this alternative, the accuser would be responsible for all court costs, DNA testing fees, and attorney fees. This approach aims to discourage fraudulent claims against innocent men who may otherwise be forced to hire attorneys.

Substantiating Fraudulent Claims

The challenge lies in proving that the paternity claim was knowingly fraudulent. Many cases are complex, making it difficult to definitively establish knowledge of the deception. Thorough proof is crucial; a man would need to demonstrate that he could not have had access to the woman for more than two weeks on either side of the week of conception. Alternatively, he would need to show that the woman had run a DNA test proving another man as the biological father.

Public Policy and Morality

A fascinating public policy proposal suggests treating paternity fraud similarly to other forms of fraud, providing compensation for financial losses and imposing fines. However, it's important to note that in cases involving multiple possible fathers, it's impossible for a woman to definitively know the father.

Rare Cases of Paternity Fraud

According to experts, genuine cases of paternity fraud are extremely rare. Often, men seeking paternity fraud as an excuse are addressing a lack of trust or the natural inclination to doubt when faced with unexpected situations. When a woman names the wrong man as the father, it's usually because she thinks she knows who the father is, despite a lack of conclusive proof. Such borderline beliefs are addressed through the legal system with a requirement for proved actual knowledge.

Conclusion and Legal Theory

While men may be understandably shocked and angry upon discovering they are not the biological father, the legal system does not provide a basis for reimbursing emotional distress or financial loss from mistaken paternity. Instead, men may explore other legal theories, such as breach of trust, interference with parental rights, or defamation, to seek redress.