Introduction

Context and Background

Mr. Anupam Kher, a renowned Indian actor, has recently become a topic of debate due to his political affiliations with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). This essay critically examines whether Anupam Kher has become a full-time "visionary" under the BJP, providing a nuanced look into his career and beliefs.

Anupam Kher's Background and Impact

Respected Career as an Actor

And, indeed, Mr. Kher brings a wealth of experience to the table, an esteemed actor who has captured the hearts of viewers through his sensitive and authentic portrayals in both new wave and art films. Even his commercial successes have been lauded. However, recent actions and statements suggest a shift in his public persona, sparking questions about his political ideology and its implications.

Criticisms and Naivety

Recent critiques have pointed to a perceived naivety in his support of the BJP and its ideologies. It is argued that someone with Anupam Kher's background, particularly his social conscience, should not endorse a political party that promotes what many perceive as a fascist agenda. The support for the BJP, especially given his background, may be seen as a dangerous sell-out for its critically sensitive policies and actions.

Political Alignment and Bollywood

BJP Leadership and Celebrity Endorsements

The BJP is now often seen as a mere follower of its leader, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose charm and charisma have captured the public's imagination. Many believe that the current government, with its leadership, is the answer to numerous ongoing issues. However, there is skepticism that such support ignores the deeper complexities and realities on the ground, especially in regions like Kashmir.

Kashmiri Pandits and Historical Context

Mr. Kher's recent endorsement of the BJP, particularly in light of the Kashmir conflict, raises serious concerns. The September 5, 2019, announcements by the current government, including the revocation of article 370, had devastating consequences for the Kashmiri Pandits. Many of his friends and acquaintances shared first-hand accounts of the communal violence and the emotional turmoil these events caused. It is argued that any support from a public figure with such knowledge and understanding is misplaced and problematic.

Conclusion

While Anupam Kher has contributed significantly to the Indian film industry and is respected for his social activities, the recent controversy underscores the importance of being aware of the political stakes involved. It may be crucial for public figures to recognize the potential for their words and actions to influence the populace and to critically assess the consequences of their endorsements. The BJP's coalition with the RSS and its implications on regions like Kashmir highlight the need for a deeper understanding of the complexities involved.