Is Hrithik Roshan Equally as Good or Even Better for the Role of Baahubali?

The discussion around the role of Baahubali has often revolved around which actor brings the character to life more authentically. Prabhas, the original actor, has been widely praised for his deep connection to the role. However, the question of whether Hrithik Roshan could have been equally good or even better has sparked considerable debate. Let's explore the aspects that make Hrithik a compelling contender for the role.

Physical Attractiveness and Screen Presence

One of the first aspects to consider is Hrithik Roshan's physicality and screen presence. With his chiseled looks, flawless physique, and commanding screen presence, Hrithik has often been compared to the ancient Greek gods—earning him the nickname ‘Greek God’. His ability to portray intense emotions and physical prowess in action roles is a significant asset. He stands tall enough to play a character like Baahubali, and he could bulk up further if required to suit the role.

Acting Experience and Versatility

Hrithik Roshan's versatility as an actor can be seen from his prior experience playing mythological roles in films like Jodha Akbar. This experience would have certainly prepared him to play Baahubali, a character rooted in myths and ancient history. Additionally, his involvement in multiple genres, including romance and action, adds credibility to his ability to bring both romantic and fight scenes to life effectively.

Collaboration with Rajamouli

One of the key factors in determining whether Hrithik could have been as good as Prabhas is his potential collaboration with S.S. Rajamouli, the visionary director behind the Baahubali series. Rajamouli is known for his meticulous attention to detail and demanding filming processes. Hrithik, known as a 'director's actor', would have been more than willing to undergo the rigorous physical and emotional transformation required to embody the character.

Performance and Physical Demands

The role of Baahubali requires not just talent but the physical capability to perform complex action sequences, dance routines, and intense emotional scenes. Hrithik's prior experiences, such as his transformation for films like Guzaarish, Koi Mil Gaya, and more recently Kaabil and Super 30, exemplify his adaptability and dedication to his craft.

Versatility and Sacrifice

While Hrithik's physical and acting skills are undoubtedly up to the challenge, it's worth noting that a big factor in Prabhas's performance was his long-term commitment to the role. Playing Baahubali meant a significant sacrifice of five years of films and career progression. This level of dedication is not something we can readily attribute to Hrithik, as his decision would be influenced by various personal and professional factors.

Conclusion

Whether Hrithik Roshan would have been equally good or even better for the role of Baahubali is a matter of personal preference. Considering the acting and physical requirements, Hrithik definitely ticks both boxes. He has the physique, screen presence, and acting versatility to play the character convincingly. However, the ultimate decision would depend on his willingness to make the same level of sacrifice and commitment that Prabhas did.

On a lighter note, it's fun to imagine Hrithik performing the dance routine at the end of the 'Sivuni Aana' song. While we may never know for sure, it's an interesting thought experiment that adds to the rich narrative of Baahubali and the actors involved.