Is Donald Trump Really Owing Thanks for John McCain's Funeral? An Analysis
The recent controversy surrounding whether Donald Trump should be thanked for John McCain's funeral has reignited debates on political sensitivity and respect for fallen veterans. The insinuation that a former President should be commended for providing a dignified farewell to a war hero underscores the broader issue of political manipulation through appreciation.
Congress and Cathedral: Who Truly Decided?
It is vital to separate fact from fiction when discussing the nuances of John McCain's funeral. The decision to honor a deceased public figure is a complex process involving multiple entities, primarily Congress and religious institutions.
Concerning the honor of being placed on public display, the decision was made by Congress. The _Capitol Rotunda_ honors national heroes, and this step shows that the American people, through their representatives, believed John McCain warranted such recognition. Similarly, the _Washington National Cathedral_, despite allowing other figures to conduct funerals there, is not government-controlled and maintains its own standards. The church ultimately decided to allow McCain's funeral service at their venue, a testament to the individual's status and influence.
Trivializing Military Service and Political Facts
Trump's claim that he had a significant role in arranging the funeral is both misleading and irrelevant. Military personnel, such as the Naval Academy choir, participated out of duty, and the use of a government aircraft for transport was a routine part of any dignified military service. These actions are standard procedures that do not necessarily indicate Trump's personal involvement. Moreover, the decision to lower flags was not an exclusive presidential function; it was a response to widespread public outcry.
Contrary to Trump's implication, the signing of the execution order to have the flag flown at half-mast was a procedural step. Most individuals would sign such an order due to the public expectation of honoring fallen heroes. Trump's assertion that such an act would be seen as a rare concession is unfounded and demonstrates a lack of understanding about standard military and civic procedures.
The Unfounded Fame and Fawning Controversy
Trump's behavior surrounding John McCain has been nothing short of offensive. McCain, a decorated war hero, experienced extensive captivity and suffered immensely. The notion that one must succeed in every aspect of life to be deemed respectable is deplorable. McCain's decision to stay with his comrades despite the option to escape reflects his dedication and selflessness. Trump's smear campaign unfairly targeted McCain, alleging that his military honors were undeserved, which is both unfounded and tactless.
The McCain family, considering their historical involvement in political and military endeavors, would be particularly conscious of the political ramifications of any show of gratitude towards the current administration. Given Trump's history with John McCain, the idea that the McCain family would thank Trump for his supposed "concession" is nonsensical. They would logically reject such a notion, as it aligns poorly with the family's values and the principles they embody.
Major Edit: Trump's Role and Misunderstanding
Further investigation reveals that even Trump's claim of having a say in the funeral arrangements is flawed. There is no evidence to suggest that he had any substantial role in ensuring the procedures followed were elaborate or respectful. His statements about approving the plane and flag protocol were likely responses to public pressure rather than indicators of any personal intervention.
Trump's claims of heroism and exceptionalism in arranging McCain's funeral serve a political purpose, aiming to shore up support or shift public perception. However, such assertions are devoid of factual basis and contribute to the ongoing narrative of political posturing and manipulation.
Conclusion: Separating Fact from Fiction
John McCain's funeral was a testament to the respect and admiration commanded by a war hero, recognized not just by the Administration but by the American people as a whole. The complexities involved in arranging such a service highlight the undercurrents of political maneuvering, where personal and national sentiments often clash. For a more nuanced understanding, it is crucial to dig beyond the initial claims and examine the underlying facts.