Introduction to the Canon Debate
The world of Harry Potter has been abuzz with debate since the publication of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. J.K. Rowling's decision to call the play 'canon' has sparked numerous discussions among fans and critics alike. This essay explores the implications of canonization and draws parallels with other franchises to provide a fresh perspective on the debate.
Understanding the Canon
Canonicity refers to the status of a work or piece of information in relation to a particular franchise or series. In the context of the Harry Potter universe, the term is used to describe whether events, characters, or plotlines from the play are considered part of the official and continuous history of the series.
Case for 'Cursed Child' as Canon
J.K. Rowling, as the creator and owner of the Harry Potter characters, has the final say in determining what is or is not canon. This is a significant point for those who support the canonization of Cursed Child. While the play has its share of inconsistencies and controversial elements, J.K. Rowling's authority as the author cannot be ignored.
Consequences of Acknowledging Cursed Child
Debating the canonization of Cursed Child means considering the ramifications of its acceptance. If the play is deemed canon, then its events, characters, and plotlines will be considered part of the official Harry Potter narrative moving forward. This can be problematic due to the inconsistencies and perceived failures in character development. For instance, the portrayal of Harry and Draco as ineffectual fathers has been criticized.
Historical Precedents: Battlestar Galactica and Psycho
To better understand the dynamics of canonization, it is useful to look at historical examples. Battlestar Galactica 1980 offers valuable insights. After the cancellation of the original series, the creators recognized the need to address fan reactions. They released a new series that disregarded the events of the cancelled show, allowing them to continue the franchise without controversy.
Psycho: A Case Study in Multiple Retellings
The film Psycho by Alfred Hitchcock provides a fascinating parallel. The 1960 classic ended with a tragic conclusion, but in 1983, Alfred Hitchcock himself directed a sequel that continued the story. While the second film received mixed reviews, it demonstrated the possibility of revisiting a canonized work.
Conclusion and Hope for Future Changes
The debate around the canonization of Cursed Child is intense, but history shows that canon can be reassessed and revised. Just as Glenn A. Larson reversed his decision about Battlestar Galactica 1980, J.K. Rowling might have a chance to re-evaluate her stance. If she were to reverse her decision, it would allow for a more cohesive and satisfying narrative for fans.
In conclusion, while the canonization of Cursed Child remains a controversial topic, it is crucial to recognize the power of creators and the potential for change in the future. Ultimately, the decision to continue with or reverse canonization rests with those who own the intellectual property, and fans can hope that a reevaluation might lead to a more harmonious and satisfying continuation of the Harry Potter universe.