Is Blue Bloods Losing Its Luster? A Fan’s Take on the Tom Selleck-Featured Cop Show
I've been a fan of Tom Selleck-starring cop show Blue Bloods for many years. However, in the past year and a half, the storyline has become repetitive and boring. Despite my appreciation for the iconic character of Frank Reagan, played by Tom Selleck, the narrative of the show has recently faltered. At 79 years old, it's time to consider ending the show or significantly reworking its approach.
Has the Plot Become Repetitive?
One of the most glaring issues with Blue Bloods is the incredible level of predictability. Each episode seems to follow a pattern that has been seen many times before. While the premise of the show as a working-class police family in New York City is unique, the execution has become stagnant. The police procedural aspects are well-executed, but the personal stories of the characters often feel recycled and unoriginal.
Tom Selleck's Age and Its Impact
Another significant factor that affects the show's current quality is the age of the lead actor, Tom Selleck. When the show first aired, Selleck looked like a man in his late 40s, if not younger. Now, at 79 years old, it’s clear he has aged significantly, which raises questions about the feasibility of him playing a character that is meant to be a budding, efficient, and sharp police commissioner in New York City.
Alternatives to Addressing the Issue
Given the current state of Blue Bloods, there are several potential ways to reignite the show's appeal. First, a significant revamp of the storyline could introduce fresh elements while maintaining the core family dynamics. This could include a new case profile that challenges the characters in unexpected ways or the introduction of new characters who spark new storylines. However, this kind of retooling might be resource-intensive and could be seen as a risky move for a show that has been successful for a long time.
Another option could be to explore alternative story arcs within the existing framework. This might involve delving deeper into the personal lives of the characters, especially the younger generations. For instance, private struggles of Detective Danny Reagan, the youngest son, could provide a fresh angle for exploring deeper scripts and meaningful character development. Similarly, the older characters could be given more complexity in their relationships, such as taking on different leadership roles beyond the police department.
Conclusion: Time to Evolve or End?
Taking into account both the predictability of the plot and Tom Selleck’s advancing age, it is worth considering whether Blue Bloods needs a substantial overhaul or should be brought to a graceful end. Ending the show with a well-crafted finale that resonates with its audience might be the most respectful way to honor the legacy of the show and its characters.
As the series progresses, it is important for the writers and producers to listen to the feedback from fans and make challenging but necessary changes to keep the show engaging and relevant. If they do not, it may face diminishing viewership and ultimately lose its loyal fan base. The question remains: can Blue Bloods evolve and change, or will it fade away with the passage of time?
What do you think? Share your thoughts on the future of Blue Bloods in the comments below.