Introduction

When considering what Barbara Walters would do if she were still actively interviewing, particularly in the case of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, it's clear that her style and approach would differ significantly from modern interview practices. Barbara Walters was known for her productively information-oriented style, her class, and her ability to ask open-ended questions without sensationalism.

Barbara Walters' Approach to Interviews

Barbara Walters would have been more direct: In interviews, Walters was known for her no-nonsense, direct style, preferring to inform rather than entertain with tabloid narratives. This is evident in her approach to controversial figures, always aiming for truth and understanding over sensationalism.

The couple is neither new news nor newsworthy: In the case of Harry and Meghan, Walters might have seen little value in this interview. She would have recognized that the couple has already disclosed much of their story, and an interview with them would not bring any new, significant revelation to the public.

Responsible journalism: Given the current state of responsible journalism vs. sensationalism, Walters would have prioritized responsible journalism over the kind of Geraldo Rivera-style sensationalism. She would have ensured that any interview she conducted was sensitive to the appropriate timing and context.

Events Leading to the Interview

The decision to conduct an interview with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle presented significant challenges. Given Prince Philip's serious illness, Walters would have been especially careful with the timing of such an interview, recognizing that it would be inappropriate to proceed under these circumstances.

Moreover, the release of the interview on Commonwealth Day would have been another red flag for Walters. She would have questioned the appropriateness of such a heavy political event being overshadowed by a personal interview that might raise tensions.

Evaluating the Interviewer's Character and Style

Character analysis: In the face of the narrative set by Oprah Winfrey, which arguably concentrated on racial sympathies, Barbara Walters would have taken a different approach. She would have been more direct and less about personal sympathy.

Evaluating questioning style: Walters would have asked open-ended questions rather than framing them as accusations disguised as questions. This method would allow the interviewees to speak freely and provide more nuanced and detailed responses.

Class and Conduct: Barbara Walters was known for her class and professionalism. In conducting such an interview, she would have maintained a clear and respectful demeanor, challenging any allegations made by the Sussexes without resorting to name-calling or sensationalism.

Conclusion

Barbara Walters would have been a stern yet fair interviewer, ensuring the interview was conducted with sensitivity to the broader context. Her focus would have been on the substance of the conversation, the truth, and the appropriate timing of such a high-profile interview.

It's clear that she would have looked at the entire situation—ranging from the timing of the interview to the undercurrents of the story—before deciding to go ahead with it. With her commitment to responsible journalism, Walters would have insisted on fairness, respect, and context in every aspect of the interview.