How the Police Would Handle an Armored Vehicle Threat

When a criminal operates an armored vehicle, handling the situation effectively and efficiently is critical. This article explores the typical strategies and methods law enforcement might employ to deal with such a scenario, drawing from both theoretical approaches and real-world examples.

Preemptive Measures and Legalities

First and foremost, it is crucial to identify the reasons behind the potential use of an armored vehicle. Criminals often use these types of vehicles for their intimidating size and protective capabilities, making them formidable threats. However, restricting their use on public roads is a common practice. In the United States, DMVs (Department of Motor Vehicles) do not issue licenses for vehicles that are not street legal, such as narco tanks or other heavily armored vehicles. This certification is aimed at ensuring public safety and preventing illegal activities.

Immediate Response Techniques

In a rapid response, law enforcement officials may employ several tactics. One common method is the use of tear gas, designed to disorient the occupants and make them less effective in controlling the vehicle. Additionally, attempting to block the vehicle, such as by surrounding it, can immobilize it by making it impossible to maneuver. Another technique involves rendering the tires ineffective through deflation, thus halting the vehicle's progress.

In some cases, police forces have access to more advanced measures. For example, law enforcement may use .50 caliber sniper rifles, or contact nearby National Guard armories for equipment and ammunition. These options can be particularly useful if the criminal uses a high-powered armament to protect the vehicle. However, such drastic measures are typically reserved for escalated situations and are not the first line of defense.

Combat Strategies and Military Support

When faced with an armored vehicle, law enforcement personnel often consider their capabilities and limitations. Heavily armored vehicles like tanks have significant drawbacks that can be exploited. These include high fuel consumption, weight limitations, and a lack of stealth or subtle movement. These factors can severely hinder the vehicle's ability to operate in urban or restrictive environments.

One of the most effective strategies is to position officers close to the armored vehicle, aiming to find its weak points. For instance, setting fire to the tires or utilizing tear gas can be effective in disabling the vehicle. Experience from previous incidents suggests that these tactics can neutralize the threat quickly.

There is a higher probability that an officer responding to such an event will have military training or be familiar with military-grade equipment. For example, a police officer with military experience may know how to effectively engage an armored vehicle. The presence of a Marine Corps Reserve gunnery sergeant, as in the San Diego incident, underscores the importance of such expertise.

Legislative and Legal Considerations

While military units can provide critical support, their involvement in civil law enforcement is typically limited. Federal troops are not permitted to intervene in civilian matters. However, state governors can activate National Guard units to assist in law enforcement operations. These units can have the necessary weapons and equipment to handle the situation without crossing into federal territory.

Once an armored vehicle is immobilized, the next step is to maintain surveillance. Given the size and weight of these vehicles, they are less mobile than regular cars and can be easily identified. Surveillance ensures that the vehicle cannot move or cause further harm. Local police forces can coordinate with military or federal units if needed, ensuring a well-rounded approach to neutralize the threat.

Conclusion

In handling an armored vehicle threat, law enforcement must be prepared with a range of strategies, from initial defense to advanced combat techniques. Understanding the capabilities and limitations of such vehicles is key to developing an effective response plan. The involvement of experienced personnel, whether from the military or law enforcement ranks, can significantly enhance the chances of a successful outcome.