How Does Evil Dead 2013 Differ from the Original Two Movies?

Introduction to Evil Dead 2013

The 2013 Evil Dead reboot, while maintaining the spirit of the franchise, significantly diverges from the first two movies. The original series, focusing primarily on Ash Williams as the protagonist, offered a unique blend of action, humor, and horror. In contrast, the 2013 reboot explores a darker and more gritty tone, shifting away from the character of Ash to create a fresh narrative experience. This article delves into how the 2013 installment differs from the original two movies, emphasizing the changes in plot, tone, and character focus.

Changes in Tone and Plot

The 2013 Evil Dead reboot is notably distinct from the original movies in terms of tone and plot. Unlike the earlier films, which leaned heavily into dark humor and a lighthearted campiness, this reboot adopts a more somber and intense approach. The story follows a group of young adults who, much like in the original movies, discover the Necronomicon and unleash a supernatural evil upon themselves. However, the 2013 version achieves a far more sinister and dark atmosphere, marking a significant departure from the original movies.

Shifting Away from Ash Williams

A critical difference between the 2013 reboot and the first two films is the absence of Ash Williams as the protagonist. While Ash is a prominent character in both the 1981 and 1987 movies, the 2013 version explores the premise without him. This change provides a fresh perspective on the supernatural horror and allows for a different narrative focus. Instead of relying on Ash as the main character and the source of humor, the 2013 reboot introduces new characters and subplots, such as Mia, a drug addict trying to overcome her addiction in the cabin.

Key Differences and Comparisons

To better understand the differences between Evil Dead 2013 and the original movies, it is helpful to compare them:

Differences from the First Two Movies

Subplot Involvement: In the original movies, the group of young adults were trespassers at the cabin, whereas in the 2013 reboot, they own the cabin and have a subplot involving Mia, a drug addict. This contrast highlights the shift from a invasion of a sacred space to a more personalized and intimate setting. Survivability and Genre: The 1987 version of Evil Dead features a survivalist element where Ash is the survivalist hero against supernatural forces. In the 2013 reboot, the story is less about Ash's survival and more about the group's collective terror. Additionally, while Evil Dead II (1987) incorporated dark humor, the 2013 version is more focused on horror, aligning more closely with the 1992 film Army of Darkness. Protagonist Focus: While Evil Dead II (1987) and The Army of Darkness (1992) revolve around Ash Williams, the 2013 reboot introduces a new protagonist and shifts the focus away from the entertaining, humorous side of Ash to a more somber and intense narrative.

Conclusion

The 2013 Evil Dead reboot stands apart from the original two movies, offering a new narrative direction that emphasizes a darker, more intense horror experience. While it maintains some of the key plot beats of the original, the absence of Ash Williams and the focus on shifting tones and subplots create a compelling and distinct cinematic experience. Fans of the franchise will appreciate the fresh take on the legendary tale, setting the stage for a new generation of horror enthusiasts to engage with this supernatural narrative.