Why Do Some Claim We Allow Freedom of Speech Yet Do Not Let Trump Supporters State They Like Trump?
Freedom of Speech is a fundamental right that allows individuals to express their opinions, including supporting political figures like Donald Trump, without fear of governmental reprisal. However, many argue that this freedom is not fully upheld in practice, especially when it comes to political speech on the internet. Let's delve into the nuances of this debate.
The Meaning of Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Speech, as enshrined in various constitutions and international agreements, is primarily about governmental action. It ensures that the state cannot silence individuals through arrest, fines, or other legal actions for expressing their opinions, even those that others may find offensive or distasteful. However, it does not mandate that others must provide a platform for every opinion to be heard.
Governmental vs. Non-Governmental Actions
When individuals or groups like Quora or a social media moderator delete comments or take down posts, they are exercising their own freedom of speech. They are choosing not to allow certain content on their platforms. This action is not an infringement on the original poster's right to freely express their views, but rather a decision based on their own standards, policies, and community guidelines.
Exercising Freedom of Speech
Just as the original poster has the right to express their views, the individual or platform has the right to respond to those views. They can answer back, call names, provide reasons why the views are wrong, or simply voice an opposite opinion. These actions are also forms of expressing freedom of speech.
Control Over Publishing Platforms
Similarly, newspapers, online forums, and social media platforms have the right to decide what content they publish. They are not obligated to publish every letter or article received. Publishers, including social media platforms, can choose what they believe is relevant, appropriate, and in line with their policies. This right to choose what is published is essential to the operation of these platforms, which would otherwise be inundated with every possible viewpoint.
Employment and Support for Politicians
Employers have the right to choose who they wish to hire. If a potential employee shows up for a job interview wearing a MAGA hat, they can be judged based on a variety of factors, including the opinion of the organization's customers. Employers are not obligated to hire someone simply because they support a certain political figure, as long as the reasoning is not discriminatory.
Legal Protections Against Threats
In cases where individuals are physically threatened or harmed for expressing their views, the protections are under different legal frameworks, such as assault or threats. Such actions are illegal, and the victims have recourse through the legal system. Simply speaking one's views does not constitute an illegal act.
Conclusion
Freedom of Speech is a complex issue, and it often involves reconciling individual rights with the realities of internet platforms, employment practices, and legal protections. Understanding the nuances of these concepts is crucial for promoting a healthy, respectful, and free speech environment.