Evidences of Criminal Activities by Donald Trump: Debunking Popular Misconceptions

Recent claims questioning whether or not Donald Trump is a criminal hinge on a small percentage of information spread predominantly through disinformation. However, there are significant pieces of evidence that consistently point towards criminal activities, from theft to obstruction of justice, and beyond. This article aims to present these evidences in a clear and concise manner, debunking popular misconceptions and providing factual information.

Thievery of Federal Property

One of the most tangible and concrete evidences of criminal activity involves Donald Trump's theft of federal property. According to reports, Trump had boxes of federal property at Mar-a-lago, a private estate. Government property, by definition, belongs to the US government. Therefore, the act of taking these items without authorization constitutes theft, a felony. This is not subject to any defense related to declassification of documents, as the property itself remained in government hands.

Obstruction of Justice

Beyond the theft, there is also evidence of obstruction of justice. Trump is alleged to have ordered a subordinate to hide these documents at Mar-a-lago to prevent the FBI from finding them. This proactive effort to obstruct a federal investigation is a serious criminal offense.

Election Interference

A more severe charge of criminal activity involves election interference. In a recording, Trump is heard asking the Governor of Georgia to "find" thousands of nonexistent votes. While the specifics of this request remain a point of contention, the recorded message itself provides significant evidence of criminal activity, likely constituting interference with the democratic process.

Additional Criminal Charges

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, there are currently 91 felony charges against Donald Trump. Every single one of these charges was charged by a grand jury of his peers, after thoroughly examining the evidence provided. Not a single indictment came from a District Attorney or a state Attorney General. This multi-layered evidence is indicative of a serious criminal case against Trump.

Other Accusations and Legal Battles

Beyond the major criminal cases, there are several other allegations and legal battles that further substantiate the claims of criminal activities. For example, Trump is accused of improperly pressuring an election official, Brad Raffensperger, to find 11,780 missing votes. Additionally, a jury found Trump liable for sexually abusing model E. Jean Carroll. These allegations are under further investigation and may evolve as the legal process continues.

The Democrat Staged Insurrection

It is important to note that while there are criminal activities associated with the Trump administration, one of the largest and most notable was the Democrat-staged insurrection on January 6, 2021. Key events leading up to this insurrection include:

Refusal of National Guard Protection: House Speaker Pelosi refused National Guard protection, which may have contributed to the vulnerability of the capital. Deactivated Electronic Locks: All electronic locks within the Capitol were deactivated, allowing easier access for unauthorized individuals. FBI Agitators: FBI agitators were directed to guide the group through the Capitol Building, leading to uncontrolled movement and potential chaos. Unrestricted Access: Capital Guard members unlocked doors, essentially treating the situation as a tour rather than an insurrection.

The January 6 insurrection was a deeply concerning and illegal act, but it is not the only evidence of criminal activity associated with the Trump administration. The evidence against Trump is extensive and spans a range of crimes, from theft to obstruction of justice and beyond.

In conclusion, the mounting evidence against Donald Trump paints a clear picture of criminal activities, from theft and obstruction of justice to election interference. The consistency of this evidence across multiple charges and cases makes it difficult to brush off these claims as mere speculation or 'troll' questions. It is crucial for the public to remain informed and critically evaluate the evidence, rather than dismissing it out of preconceived biases.