Dr. Who and the Merging of Science and Fantasy: A Scientist's View
Dr. Who is one of the most beloved and enduring franchises in television history. However, as an atheist and scientist, the way Dr. Who explains phenomena often causes discomfort. While the show must blend science with fantasy to maintain its mystical and adventurous nature, this sometimes leads to an overreliance on scientific jargon without substantive scientific backing.
Dr. Who: Fantasy over Hard Science
Dr. Who, it should be noted, is more of a fantasy show than a hard science fiction show. The scientific explanations often employed in the series are more akin to magical explanations than credible scientific reasoning. This is further evident in the use of pseudoscientific concepts and terminology that often lack a solid grounding in reality.
For instance, the show frequently uses the term scientific jargon such as electromagnetic fields or paranormal phenomena to rationalize its plot devices. This approach often feels convenient and lazy rather than grounded in rigorous scientific thought. The show relies on the audience to suspend their disbelief, much like with any other fantasy or horror series.
Constructing Models of Magic
While I appreciate the logical consistency within the fantasy universe of Dr. Who, I don't insist that these fictional elements align with real-world science. In fact, I often construct my own models to explain the magical elements within the show. This allows me to enjoy the narrative while maintaining a detachable perspective. However, there are instances where the scientific jargon used in the show is presented as a form of real science without substantive evidence.
These instances can be jarring and remind me of the illogical elements that are often used to drive the plot forward. For example, when the show references emotional regulation or telepathic communication in ways that don't hold up to scientific scrutiny, it can be frustrating.
A Allegory and Technobabble
Dr. Who is often seen as an allegory, with much of the technobabble derived from spiritualists and parapsychologists. The approach taken in the show is more about plot convenience than scientific accuracy. In the real world, when someone from the real world tries to use scientific jargon in a similar manner, it can be highly offensive.
For example, when a homeopathic physician or a Young Earth Creationist starts talking about electromagnetic fields or other jargon without a solid scientific foundation, it can be striking. The integrity of scientific language is often compromised, leading to misleading or false representations of scientific concepts.
Instead of insisting on real-world scientific realism, I prefer a logical continuity within the fictional universe. The mystical properties introduced in Dr. Who often serve a narrative purpose rather than a scientific one. This allows for a suspension of disbelief without the necessity of real-world science to support the fantastical elements.
In conclusion, while Dr. Who is a delightful and entertaining show, it is essential to recognize the distinction between the fantasy elements and real-world science. The show can be appreciated for its imaginative storytelling, but it is important to maintain a critical perspective when evaluating its scientific content.