Do Modern Warships Need a Bridge: Why Human Eyes Are Irreplaceable
With advancements in technology, the question arises whether modern warships need a bridge, with all controls potentially being done via CCTV cameras from a safer, below-deck position.
Bridge and CCTV: A Comparative Analysis
As a seasoned sailor, I have a wide-angle CCTV mounted on the masthead to prevent collisions. Additionally, a remote control linked to an auto pilot allows me to control the boat. Yet, I prefer using the cameras as supplementary tools rather than the primary means of control. The reasoning behind this is straightforward: human eyes, with both sight and ability to comprehensively assess situations, are unparalleled.
We have two eyes, not one. By turning our heads, we can assess a variety of nuances that are difficult, if not impossible, to reproduce electronically. Even though CCTV systems offer valuable assistance in conditions like fog, rain, and darkness, they lack the full spectrum of human perception. Hence, having the opportunity to use both eyes is crucial. I always ensure my cameras and monitors are on when sailing, underlining their immense value as an aid.
The Importance of a Bridge
A bridge is an indispensable part of any warship, serving as a crucial command center. In the event of damage, including communication systems, a CCTV system may fail. This would leave the warship without critical visibility, a situation where human eyes remain essential.
Warships often have multiple command stations: the bridge, CIC (Combat Information Center), and engine room. However, for comprehensive control and visibility, a bridge is necessary. A below-deck CIC provides valuable information and strategic command. Nevertheless, when power outage or other technical issues arise, a bridge ensures that the commander can still oversee the situation.
Evolution of Warship Design
Historically, warships often carried an armored conning tower for commanding officers, designed to be heavily protected yet limiting the field of vision. These conning towers, some as thick as 12 inches, were eventually removed to save weight and improve stability. However, this did not eliminate the need for a high vantage point. No CCTV system can match the width and breadth of human vision. They can scan the skies, observe the proximity of ships during refueling, and monitor activities on the deck. These tasks are inherently suited to the human eye.
The potential failure of a complex system, like in the case of the Bismarck losing her communications and radar systems as a result of the shock from her main battery firing, underlines the limitations of technology. While modern warships can be equipped with highly sophisticated systems, they rely heavily on the human operator to make quick decisions and adapt to changing circumstances.
Conclusion
It is clear that while CCTV systems and other technological advancements in warship design offer numerous advantages, they are not yet a complete replacement for the human presence. The command bridge remains an irreplaceable feature of modern warships. Commanders and crew members inherently prefer the ability to use their "Mark One eyeballs" to oversee the ship, and for good reason. As technology continues to evolve, the human element will likely remain the cornerstone of naval command.