Do Anti-Queer Republicans Miss the Point by Targeting Drag Shows Instead of Child Beauty Pageants?
Many Republicans claim to be against drag queens because they say it 'grooms kids' to prioritize outward beauty, leading to the idea that only a son born to the family can bring financial stability and grandchildren. There is no evidence supporting these claims, yet the same group shows no concern over children's beauty pageants, which also aim to groom children into valuing outward beauty. This article explores this paradox and questions whether the opposition to drag shows is truly about preserving family values or something else.
TargetingDrag Shows Rather Than Beauty Pageants
The concern over drag shows, particularly when it comes to young boys, often stems from a fear that exposure to gay men will somehow 'groom' boys to focus on their outward appearances. This view is rooted in the belief that true masculinity requires physical strength, financial success, and the ability to support one’s family. Drag queens are seen as weak and effeminate, unable to achieve these goals. This perspective is often reflected in the character of Rudolph in the famous film Priscilla, Queen of the Desert.
On the other hand, child beauty pageants are seen as an innocent pathway for girls to learn about beauty and self-confidence. The message is clear: a beautiful daughter can attract potential husbands who will support the family and provide for future generations. The parallel with Cinderella and her step-sisters is a stark reminder that this worldview values external beauty as a birthright.
Beauty Pageants Aren't the Only Concern
While it is true that certain child beauty pageants groom children into valuing outward beauty, these events are optional and often protected by parents who are aware of the potential risks. In contrast, drag shows, particularly those aimed at younger audiences, are recognized as adult content and should only be experienced by individuals who are prepared for the mature themes involved.
The lack of a public outcry against child beauty pageants from Republicans raises questions about the sincerity of their motives. Some may argue that the exposure of reality shows about beauty pageants, often referred to as 'stage moms', has dampened the enthusiasm of these pageant mothers. However, this does not justify the selective targeting of drag shows.
Is It about Family Values?
Often, the opposition to drag shows is couched in the rhetoric of 'pro-life' values and the belief that only a 'true' mother can give birth to a child. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s statements about motherhood and the fear of gay sons adopting children highlight a broader ideological tension within the Republican party. Ironically, this stance also undermines the value of adoptive parents and anyone who can provide a loving home for a child.
Given that many Republican parents are not overly enthusiastic about child beauty pageants themselves, it appears that the opposition to drag shows is not a genuine stance for the preservation of family values. Instead, it may be more about fear and traditional gender roles that are becoming increasingly outdated in modern society.
In conclusion, the selective targeting of drag shows while ignoring child beauty pageants reveals a dissonance in the values and priorities of a segment of the Republican party. It is time to re-evaluate these positions and align them with a more inclusive and forward-thinking perspective on family and personal development.