Differences Between Critics’ and Typical Audiences’ Perspectives on Movies

Introduction

When it comes to evaluating and appreciating movies, there are two distinct groups that often hold different viewpoints: critics and typical audiences. Critics tend to focus on the film's quality, delving into its story, acting, and atmosphere. On the other hand, the typical audience is more concerned with being entertained and often desires elements like car chases, exciting dialogues, and a happy ending.

Critics vs. Typical Audiences

The way critics and typical audiences view movies can seem worlds apart. Critics see films as art, scrutinizing originality and significance. The public, however, views them primarily as entertainment. This difference manifests in how they evaluate and react to films.

Critics vs. Typical Audience Process

Criss-crossing these perspectives can lead to interesting insights. Hollywood has seen movies that are highly regarded by critics but not well-received by the general public, such as The Dark Knight. Conversely, there are films that are both critically acclaimed and commercially successful. Critical success stories often include films with strong storytelling and acting, like The Silence of the Lambs.

My Dinner with Andre (1981)

A prime example of the disparity in perspective is the film My Dinner with Andre. Lasting two hours, the movie is a dialogue between two actors sitting at a table. Critics, appreciating its philosophical depth and artistic merit, loved it. However, the audience often feels disconnected from the experience, questioning its relevance when nothing significant occurs over the course of two hours.

Critics’ Expectations

Critics tend to hold films to a higher standard. High expectations are set for direction, consistency, pace, and unpredictability. Films that meet or surpass these expectations are praised. For instance, even a film like The Firm, based on a John Grisham legal thriller, receives positive reviews from both critics and audiences because it is entertaining. Critics, however, are more stringent when it comes to the film's realism and plausibility. Over-the-top or dramatic license is often scrutinized.

Evaluation by Critics and Typical Audiences

In contrast, the typical audience's evaluation is more subjective and immediate. They ask, 'Did I enjoy the movie?' or 'Was it entertaining?' This sentiment is reflected in blockbuster films that prioritize action, excitement, and traditional plot structures. Films that offer more unique and unexpected outcomes, like The Firm, might be more enjoyable but are often critiqued for their lack of realism.

Magical Agreement

There are instances where critics and audiences align in their appreciation. The film Patriots Day is a notable example. It was well-received by both critics and the audience. The 'magical agreement' occurs when a film meets the high standards set by critics while also delivering the entertainment value that the general public seeks.

Conclusion

Understanding the differing perspectives of critics and typical audiences is crucial for filmmakers, studios, and marketers. By knowing these distinct viewpoints, movies can better cater to all audiences, ensuring both critical appreciation and commercial success.