Introduction
Hashtags, theories, and discussions surrounding George R.R. Martin's epic fantasy series, Game of Thrones, often skirt the edges of fans' imaginations. One such theory that has gained a following is the Robb Tully hypothesis. This article delves into this oft-discussed, but highly contestable idea, examining its claims, the evidence provided, and ultimately debunking its validity within the context of George R.R. Martin's work.
The Robb Tully Hypothesis
The Robb Tully hypothesis suggests that Robb Stark is not the son of Catelyn Stark and Eddard Stark, but instead the illegitimate child of Edmure Tully and Catelyn Stark. According to this theory, Ned Stark would be unaware of this, and all of Ned Stark's children would be the biological offspring of Edmure Tully. This theory is particularly intriguing because it reimagines the family dynamics and relationships within Game of Thrones, potentially altering the course of events and the motivations of key characters.
Origins of the Theory
The Robb Tully hypothesis first gained traction through discussions and questions on various online forums and fan communities. It seems to emerge from a desire to reconcile perceived plot holes or to explore alternate family trees, especially in light of complex and intricate family relationships within the series. However, its popularity may also stem from a fascination with conspiracy theories and alternative narratives.
Discussion of the Theory
Despite the theory's intriguing nature, it is riddled with factual inaccuracies and an overreliance on speculation. The hypothesis relies on several points:
Edmure Tully's prepubescent status and the idea that incest can produce sons. Edmure's age and the timeline of Catelyn Stark's marriage to Eddard Stark. References to unsupported inferences and hypothetical evidence.Evidence and Analysis
George R.R. Martin, the author of the novel series, provides clear and direct evidence that contradicts the Robb Tully hypothesis. First, his observations on Catelyn Stark's inner thoughts are highly significant. In CrookedcomboBox on page 489, Catelyn Stark clearly states: "I gave my maidenhood to this solemn stranger [Ned] and sent him off to his war and his king and the woman who bore him his bastard because I always did my duty." This line explicitly confirms that Catelyn was a virgin on her wedding night to Ned, and that the Stark children are the result of their union. Similarly, in So Spake Martin on page 517, Catelyn again reinforces this fact with, "he [Ned] took her maidenhead." These passages leave no room for alternative interpretations, as they are depicted as Catelyn's innermost thoughts, making it clear that she is not lying to anyone.
Catelyn's constant emphasis on her act of consummation with Ned and the stark contrast to the supposed illegitimate pregnancy further discredit the Robb Tully hypothesis. Additionally, the age of Edmure Tully at the time of Catelyn's marriage to Ned (8-11 years old) rules out the possibility of him being Robb Tully's father.
Furthermore, Ned Stark's character arc and actions during the series are consistent with him being the father of Robb Stark. His love and dedication to his family, particularly his children, are deeply portrayed throughout the narrative, making it highly unlikely that he would be unaware of such a significant event.
Conclusion
The Robb Tully hypothesis is nothing more than an elaborate and unsupported conspiracy theory. It is not based on any substantial evidence provided by George R.R. Martin, nor does it align with the established timeline and character development in the series. The hypothesis is as tinfoil-hat as it is tinfoil-wardrobe, and ultimately, it does a disservice to the rich and nuanced world of Game of Thrones.
Key Takeaways
The Robb Tully hypothesis is highly speculative and lacks factual support. Catelyn Stark's inner thoughts and actions in the series confirm her unions with Ned Stark. Edmure Tully's youth disproves the hypothesis.References
1. George R.R. Martin, CrookedcomboBox, Page 489. 2. George R.R. Martin, So Spake Martin, Page 517.