Could Any Former Indian Prime Minister Have Handled the Pandemic Better Than Narendra Modi?
At a time when India grappled with one of the world's most devastating waves of the coronavirus pandemic, the policies and approaches of the current prime minister, Narendra Modi, came under scrutiny. Could any former Indian prime minister have managed the situation more effectively?
Clap Bang Thalis and Conch Shells
One of the most notable criticisms levied against Narendra Modi was his suggestion for Indians to clap bang thalis and blow conch shells during the anti-corona epidemic campaign. While the intention may have been to show respect for medical professionals and frontline workers, this advice seemed more like a symbolic gesture rather than a practical strategy to curb the spread of the virus. Instead of following such unconventional methods, former prime ministers would have likely taken more evidence-based measures to control the pandemic.
Magical Hour and Candles
Another questionable move was the request to switch off electric lights and light lamps for nine minutes exactly at a “magical” hour to scare off the corona virus. This approach seemed more mystical and less scientifically sound compared to implementing effective public health measures such as promoting physical distancing, mask-wearing, and vaccination drives.
No Prior Notice Lockdowns and Migrant Crisis
One of the most criticized decisions was the 21-day total lockdown, announced without an hour’s prior notice. This decision resulted in millions of migrant laborers being left stranded on the roads, with food and basic amenities being scarce. Former prime ministers, having learned from past experiences and understanding the potential human impact of such a drastic measure, would have likely taken more cautious and considerate steps.
Vaccine Diplomacy and National Pride
When India exported vaccines to other nations, proclaiming itself as a world leader in the fight against the coronavirus, the move was politically charged. However, the subsequent vaccine shortage and the country's reliance on international aid marked a significant failure. Any former prime minister would have prioritized their nation's citizens first and ensured that all necessary steps were taken to guarantee the availability of vaccines for their population.
Mass Gatherings and Controversies
Allowing large gatherings such as the Kumbh Mela in the midst of a pandemic displayed a lack of foresight and awareness of public health risks. Instead, they would have advocated for smaller, more controlled events and implemented strict health protocols to ensure the safety of participants. Moreover, the advocacy for election rallies during the pandemic period demonstrated a disregard for public health guidelines.
Procurement and Distribution of Vaccines
The handling of vaccine procurement and distribution has been a point of contention. The government's flip-flopping on vaccine policies and the eventual court intervention highlighting the arbitrary and irrational nature of certain decisions, indicated a lack of proper planning and coordination. Former prime ministers would have been more cautious and responsible in managing such a critical resource, ensuring that citizens received the vaccines they needed without delays or inconsistencies.
Conclusion
The evidence suggests that while Narendra Modi aimed to engage the public in unique ways, the overall response to the pandemic was marred by inefficiencies, lack of foresight, and a failure to prioritize public health. Any former prime minister would have managed the situation more effectively and responsibly, focusing on practical, evidence-based measures to control and mitigate the spread of the virus.
In conclusion, any former Indian prime minister would have handled the corona virus situation better than the present incumbent, Narendra Modi. Their policies and strategies would have been more aligned with public health guidelines and less prone to political missteps and miscalculations.