Clayton's Fate in Tarzan: A Meditation on Justice and Morality
Many have found themselves questioning the fate of Clayton in the classic tale of Tarzan. While Clayton, portrayed as a villain, may not be as despicable as some of the characters in Tarzan's world, the question arises: did he deserve his ultimate fate?
Clayton, Not the Villain We Might Think
Except for being a big-game hunter, there is less to be vilified about Clayton. He is not inherently evil, but his actions are. Despite the book's portrayal, Clayton is a character with both flaws and redeeming qualities. One might argue that his actions, while driven by monetary gain and a lack of empathy, do not necessarily make him the evil villain he is made out to be.
Tarzan's Compassion and Justice
It is clear that Tarzan understands that Clayton did not deserve to die. Unlike some characters in Tarzan who take life without thought, Tarzan shows humanitarian tendencies. Even when faced with the opportunity to eliminate Clayton, Tarzan attempts to save him, a gesture that underscores his compassion and belief in giving individuals a second chance.
The Significance of Clayton's Death
Clayton's death is significant not because of Tarzan's cruelty, but because of the consequences of his own actions. Clayton’s demise cannot be attributed solely to Tarzan's intervention, as his attempt to murder Tarzan was the catalyst for his own downfall. Clayton's fate is thus a result of his own evil intentions rather than a direct action by Tarzan.
Clayton, Poacher, or Big-Game Hunter?
When we consider the ethics of big-game hunting and poaching, Clayton represents a more complex figure. The actions of big-game hunters and poachers are often morally questionable, and in Tarzan's world, they are often the nemesis. However, whether Clayton is categorically the worst character in Tarzan or the most synonymous with the negative aspects of big-game hunting is debatable.
For instance, John Henry Patterson, who slew the Tsavo Man-Eaters, is considered one of the only good members of the big-game hunting community. His actions were driven by a sense of justice and self-defense, which made him a hero in some circles. Clayton, on the other hand, is more aligned with profit-driven and harmful activities, making him the antithesis of Patterson.
The Broader Implications
The story of Clayton, as depicted in Tarzan, serves as a cautionary tale about the complicity of those who profit from harming others. While Clayton’s death might seem just, the emphasis on the connection between his actions and his fate underscores the moral ambiguity of his character. It invites readers to reflect on the deeper responsibilities and ethics that underlie such moral conflicts.
Concluding Thoughts
Clayton's fate in Tarzan is a reflection of the complexities of justice and morality. While he is indeed a villain, his death paradoxically serves to highlight that true justice often resides in the actions of those affected by one's deeds. The moral journey of Clayton and the compassion shown by Tarzan make for a compelling narrative that continues to resonate with readers today.